Literature DB >> 35511368

Efficacy and characteristics of physiotherapy interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Federico Temporiti1,2, Silvano Ferrari2, Michael Kieser1, Roberto Gatti3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of physiotherapy approaches used in the treatment of LSS and compare their delivery characteristics.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, PEDro, CINAHL and Web of Science databases, from inception until March 2021. Inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of LSS confirmed through imaging techniques, RCTs written in English comparing physiotherapy interventions among them or versus placebo or usual care without restrictions on treatment and follow-up duration, outcomes related to pain, physical function, disability and quality of life. Two independent reviewers assessed records for eligibility and methodological quality (PEDro scale) and extracted participants' characteristics, interventions details and outcome measures at each timepoint. Pooled or un-pooled findings were reported as mean difference with 95% confidence interval, depending on heterogeneity. Evidence quality was rated using the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: Twelve studies (944 patients, mean PEDro score 7.6, range 5-9) were included. Three weeks of weight-supported walking improved pain and disability, while 8 weeks of aquatic exercises improved pain and walking tolerance (very low evidence). Six weeks of cycling reduced disability compared to weight-supported walking (low evidence). Six weeks of manual therapy plus exercise was not superior to supervised exercises (low evidence), but improved pain, walking tolerance, disability and quality of life compared to home/group exercises (moderate to very low evidence). Very low evidence supported 2 weeks of electromagnetic fields, whereas TENS (low evidence) and ultrasounds (very low evidence) revealed no effects.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings may assist clinicians in delivering effective physiotherapy interventions in LSS patients.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrotherapies; Exercise; Manual therapy; Physiotherapy; Spinal stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35511368     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07222-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  38 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Mitchel B Harris
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Effectiveness of surgery versus conservative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: A system review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xin-Long Ma; Xing-Wen Zhao; Jian-Xiong Ma; Fei Li; Yin Wang; Bin Lu
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 6.071

3.  The natural clinical course of lumbar spinal stenosis: a longitudinal cohort study over a minimum of 10 years.

Authors:  Akihito Minamide; Munehito Yoshida; Kazuhiro Maio
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 4.  Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luciana Gazzi Macedo; Abraham Hum; Laura Kuleba; Joey Mo; Linda Truong; Mankeen Yeung; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-07-25

Review 5.  Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Gustavo C Machado; Paulo H Ferreira; Rafael Ij Yoo; Ian A Harris; Marina B Pinheiro; Bart W Koes; Maurits W van Tulder; Magdalena Rzewuska; Christopher G Maher; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-01

6.  Central lumbar spinal stenosis: natural history of non-surgical patients.

Authors:  Per Wessberg; Karin Frennered
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The Influence of Exercise on Perceived Pain and Disability in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jarrett Slater; Morey J Kolber; Kristen C Schellhase; Chetan K Patel; Carey E Rothschild; Xinliang Liu; William J Hanney
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2015-02-16

8.  Predictive Factors for Subjective Improvement in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients with Nonsurgical Treatment: A 3-Year Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ko Matsudaira; Nobuhiro Hara; Hiroyuki Oka; Junichi Kunogi; Takashi Yamazaki; Katsushi Takeshita; Seichi Atsushi; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Conservative Treatment and Percutaneous Pain Relief Techniques in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Maurizio Fornari; Scott C Robertson; Paulo Pereira; Mehmet Zileli; Carla D Anania; Ana Ferreira; Silvano Ferrari; Roberto Gatti; Francesco Costa
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-06-23

10.  Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: Estimating Global Incidence and Worldwide Volume.

Authors:  Vijay M Ravindra; Steven S Senglaub; Abbas Rattani; Michael C Dewan; Roger Härtl; Erica Bisson; Kee B Park; Mark G Shrime
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.