Literature DB >> 7734540

A comparison of hard and soft copies processed with linear conversion and nonlinear conversion of skeletal fractures--a preliminary study.

T Kaji1, M Katayama, S Kosuda, S Kusano.   

Abstract

To compare hard copies and soft copies processed with linear and nonlinear conversion of skeletal fractures, we performed a receiver-operating characteristics study of 25 digital radiographs. There was no statistical difference between hard copies with linear and nonlinear conversion. However, it may be difficult to detect small fractures on images processed by nonlinear conversion. No significant difference was seen between CRT diagnosis and that on a hard copy processed with linear conversion and frequency enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7734540     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  5 in total

Review 1.  Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art.

Authors:  M D Murphey; J L Quale; N L Martin; J M Bramble; L T Cook; S J Dwyer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.

Authors:  M Prokop; M Galanski; J W Oestmann; U von Falkenhausen; H Rosenthal; P Reimer; J Nischelsky; S Reichelt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: an observer performance study.

Authors:  S A Wegryn; D W Piraino; B J Richmond; M D Schluchter; M Uetani; H A Freed; M A Meziane; G A Belhobek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Storage phosphor radiography of the chest.

Authors:  C M Schaefer; M Prokop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Nondisplaced fractures: spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging.

Authors:  M D Murphey; J M Bramble; L T Cook; N L Martin; S J Dwyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.