Literature DB >> 17272654

Cortical barrel lesions impair whisker-CS trace eyeblink conditioning.

Roberto Galvez1, Aldis P Weible, John F Disterhoft.   

Abstract

Whisker deflection is an effective conditioned stimulus (CS) for trace eyeblink conditioning that has been shown to induce a learning-specific expansion of whisker-related cortical barrels, suggesting that memory storage for an aspect of the trace association resides in barrel cortex. To examine the role of the barrel cortex in acquisition and retrieval of trace eyeblink associations, the barrel cortex was lesioned either prior to (acquisition group) or following (retention group) trace conditioning. The acquisition lesion group was unable to acquire the trace conditioned response, suggesting that the whisker barrel cortex is vital for learning trace eyeblink conditioning with whisker deflection as the CS. The retention lesion group exhibited a significant reduction in expression of the previously acquired conditioned response, suggesting that an aspect of the trace association may reside in barrel cortex. These results demonstrate that the barrel cortex is important for both acquisition and retention of whisker trace eyeblink conditioning. Furthermore, these results, along with prior anatomical whisker barrel analyses suggest that the barrel cortex is a site for long-term storage of whisker trace eyeblink associations.

Year:  2007        PMID: 17272654      PMCID: PMC1838550          DOI: 10.1101/lm.418407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  56 in total

1.  Cortical involvement in acquisition and extinction of trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  A P Weible; M D McEchron; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with stimulation of the mystacial vibrissae as a conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  S Das; C Weiss; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Classical conditioning rapidly induces specific changes in frequency receptive fields of single neurons in secondary and ventral ectosylvian auditory cortical fields.

Authors:  D M Diamond; N M Weinberger
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-05-07       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Trial sequence of changed unit activity in auditory system of alert rat during conditioned response acquisition and extinction.

Authors:  J F Disterhoft; D K Stuart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The intralaminar and midline nuclei of the thalamus. Anatomical and functional evidence for participation in processes of arousal and awareness.

Authors:  Ysbrand D Van der Werf; Menno P Witter; Henk J Groenewegen
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2002-09

6.  Physiological correlates of perceptual learning in monkey V1 and V2.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Ghose; Tianming Yang; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Hippocampectomy disrupts trace eye-blink conditioning in rabbits.

Authors:  J R Moyer; R A Deyo; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Templates for locating the whisker area in fresh flattened mouse and rat cortex.

Authors:  R N Strominger; T A Woolsey
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units.

Authors:  T A Woolsey; H Van der Loos
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1970-01-20       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

View more
  31 in total

1.  Differential acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus during pavlovian trace and delay conditioning.

Authors:  M Melissa Flesher; Allen E Butt; Brandee L Kinney-Hurd
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 2.  Exploring prefrontal cortical memory mechanisms with eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Multiple sites of extinction for a single learned response.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Infragranular barrel cortex activity is enhanced with learning.

Authors:  Rebekah L Ward; Luke C Flores; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Temporal patterns of inputs to cerebellum necessary and sufficient for trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tatsuya Ohyama; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The impact of hippocampal lesions on trace-eyeblink conditioning and forebrain-cerebellar interactions.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Forebrain-Cerebellar Interactions During Learning.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; Aldis P Weible; Roberto Galvez; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Cellscience       Date:  2006-10-27

Review 8.  Towards a unified model of pavlovian conditioning: short review of trace conditioning models.

Authors:  V I Kryukov
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Prefrontal control of cerebellum-dependent associative motor learning.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Li Yang; Yan Xu; Guang-yan Wu; Juan Yao; Jun Zhang; Zhi-ru Zhu; Zhi-an Hu; Jian-feng Sui; Bo Hu
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Age-related deficits in a forebrain-dependent task, trace-eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Roberto Galvez; Sabrina Cua; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.