Literature DB >> 21514394

Differential acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus during pavlovian trace and delay conditioning.

M Melissa Flesher1, Allen E Butt, Brandee L Kinney-Hurd.   

Abstract

Pavlovian trace conditioning critically depends on the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and hippocampus (HPC), whereas delay conditioning does not depend on these brain structures. Given that the cholinergic basal forebrain system modulates activity in both the mPFC and HPC, it was reasoned that the level of acetylcholine (ACh) release in these regions would show distinct profiles during testing in trace and delay conditioning paradigms. To test this assumption, microdialysis probes were implanted unilaterally into the mPFC and HPC of rats that were pre-trained in appetitive trace and delay conditioning paradigms using different conditional stimuli in the two tasks. On the day of microdialysis testing, dialysate samples were collected during a quiet baseline interval before trials were initiated, and again during performance in separate blocks of trace and delay conditioning trials in each animal. ACh levels were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection techniques. Consistent with our hypothesis, results showed that ACh release in the mPFC was greater during trace conditioning than during delay conditioning. The level of ACh released during trace conditioning in the HPC was also greater than the levels observed during delay conditioning. While ACh efflux in both the mPFC and HPC selectively increased during trace conditioning, ACh levels in the mPFC during trace conditioning testing showed the greatest increases observed. These results demonstrate a dissociation in cholinergic activation of the mPFC and HPC during performance in trace but not delay appetitive conditioning, where this cholinergic activity may contribute to attentional mechanisms, adaptive response timing, or memory consolidation necessary for successful trace conditioning.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21514394      PMCID: PMC3148348          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  75 in total

1.  Cortical involvement in acquisition and extinction of trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  A P Weible; M D McEchron; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Temporal patterns of inputs to cerebellum necessary and sufficient for trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tatsuya Ohyama; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Appetitive conditioning: neural bases and implications for psychopathology.

Authors:  C Martin-Soelch; J Linthicum; M Ernst
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Cortical barrel lesions impair whisker-CS trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Roberto Galvez; Aldis P Weible; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Differential contribution of dorsal and ventral hippocampus to trace and delay fear conditioning.

Authors:  Frederic Esclassan; Etienne Coutureau; Georges Di Scala; Alain R Marchand
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Scopolamine disruption of behavioral and hippocampal responses in appetitive trace classical conditioning.

Authors:  M A Seager; Y Asaka; S D Berry
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Augmented prefrontal acetylcholine release during challenged attentional performance.

Authors:  Rouba Kozak; John P Bruno; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Michael E Hasselmo; John P Bruno; Ben Givens
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2005-02

10.  A role for prefrontal cortex in memory storage for trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  Jason D Runyan; Anthony N Moore; Pramod K Dash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Supplemental choline during the periweaning period protects against trace conditioning impairments attributable to post-training ethanol exposure in adolescent rats.

Authors:  Pamela S Hunt
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 2.  Bridging the interval: theory and neurobiology of trace conditioning.

Authors:  Jonathan D Raybuck; K Matthew Lattal
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Why trace and delay conditioning are sometimes (but not always) hippocampal dependent: a computational model.

Authors:  Ahmed A Moustafa; Ella Wufong; Richard J Servatius; Kevin C H Pang; Mark A Gluck; Catherine E Myers
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Dopaminergic modulation of appetitive trace conditioning: the role of D1 receptors in medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  M A Pezze; H J Marshall; H J Cassaday
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Acquisition of conditioned responding in a multiple schedule depends on the reinforcement's temporal contingency with each stimulus.

Authors:  Lorenzo Morè; Greg Jensen
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Scopolamine Impairs Appetitive But Not Aversive Trace Conditioning: Role of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Marie-Astrid Pezze; Hayley J Marshall; Helen J Cassaday
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Infusions of scopolamine in dorsal hippocampus reduce anticipatory responding in an appetitive trace conditioning procedure.

Authors:  Marie A Pezze; Hayley J Marshall; Helen J Cassaday
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.708

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.