Literature DB >> 17264962

Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management.

Siegmund Braun1, Herbert Watzke, J Michael Hasenkam, Michael Schwab, Tanja Wolf, Clemens Dovifat, Heinz Völler.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze the concordance of INR values obtained by educated lay users with those obtained by professionals and to determine the imprecision of the new system. The new CoaguChek XS system was tested in a user study over six weeks at four study centres in Austria, Denmark and Germany. Seventy-five patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy were enrolled in the study. The INR results in capillary whole blood taken by professionals and by patients using the CoaguChek XS system were similar, and the mean relative bias was <1%. The imprecision of the CoaguChek XS system calculated from duplicate testing is low (<6%) and slightly better than for the established CoaguChek S system. The INR results measured during the home testing phase correlated quite well between the established CoaguChek S system and the new CoaguChek XS system with a mean bias of 0.14 INR. This is a remarkably low bias taking into consideration that more than 30 different test strip lots were applied. A questionnaire was filled out by all patients to assess their personal impression. It revealed that patients were very satisfied with the new system and found it easy to operate. The results demonstrate that the agreement between professional and patient INR results for the new CoaguChek XS system was excellent and that INR values can be determined by lay users as well as by professionals. The instrument is very well accepted by the patients and their satisfaction even increased after four weeks practice at home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17264962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  6 in total

1.  Point-of-care INR coagulometers for self-management of oral anticoagulation: primary care diagnostic technology update.

Authors:  Annette Plüddemann; Matthew Thompson; Jane Wolstenholme; Christopher P Price; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Home management of oral anticoagulation via telemedicine versus conventional hospital-based treatment.

Authors:  Henry Christensen; Jens-Jacob Lauterlein; Patricia D Sørensen; Eva R B Petersen; Jonna S Madsen; Ivan Brandslund
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Performance of the microINR Point-of-Care System Used by Self-Testing Patients: A Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Majed A Refaai; Alan K Jacobson; Jack C Rosenfeld; Robert R Orr
Journal:  TH Open       Date:  2021-12-30

4.  A randomized trial comparing INR monitoring devices in patients with anticoagulation self-management: evaluation of a novel error-grid approach.

Authors:  Lars G Hemkens; Kristian M Hilden; Stephan Hartschen; Thomas Kaiser; Ulrike Didjurgeit; Roland Hansen; Ralf Bender; Peter T Sawicki
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Assessment of whole blood coagulation with a microfluidic dielectric sensor.

Authors:  D Maji; M De La Fuente; E Kucukal; U D S Sekhon; A H Schmaier; A Sen Gupta; U A Gurkan; M T Nieman; E X Stavrou; P Mohseni; M A Suster
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Clinical evaluation of whole blood prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) using a Laser Speckle Rheology sensor.

Authors:  Markandey M Tripathi; Satoru Egawa; Alexandra G Wirth; Diane M Tshikudi; Elizabeth M Van Cott; Seemantini K Nadkarni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.