BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We have developed an expert computer system for the control of oral anticoagulation therapy, accessible by the patients via their own computer. To investigate if the weekly measurement and dosing of international normalized ratio (INR) at home using the online Internet-based system was superior to conventional treatment, we performed a randomized, controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 669 patients in our anticoagulation clinic were asked to participate in the trial, providing that they had Internet access and could use the CoaguChek XS system. A total of 140 patients were included and randomized to (A) once weekly measurement and report online, (B) twice weekly measurement and report online, and (C) continued conventional treatment with INR measurement in the lab every 4 weeks and dose adjustment by letter. RESULTS: Group A had 79.7% (95% CI 79.0-80.3) of time in therapeutic range (TTR), group B 80.2% (95% CI 79.4-80.9) of TTR, and group C 72.7% (95% CI 71.9-73.4) TTR. Groups A and B perform statistically significantly better than the conventional group C, with a difference of TTR of 7% points (p < 2.2 × 10(-16)), whereas no difference was seen between A and B. CONCLUSION: Home measurement of INR and the reporting and dosing of results online once a week increase TTR from 72% to 79% as compared to conventional computer-assisted monitoring in an anticoagulation clinic.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We have developed an expert computer system for the control of oral anticoagulation therapy, accessible by the patients via their own computer. To investigate if the weekly measurement and dosing of international normalized ratio (INR) at home using the online Internet-based system was superior to conventional treatment, we performed a randomized, controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 669 patients in our anticoagulation clinic were asked to participate in the trial, providing that they had Internet access and could use the CoaguChek XS system. A total of 140 patients were included and randomized to (A) once weekly measurement and report online, (B) twice weekly measurement and report online, and (C) continued conventional treatment with INR measurement in the lab every 4 weeks and dose adjustment by letter. RESULTS: Group A had 79.7% (95% CI 79.0-80.3) of time in therapeutic range (TTR), group B 80.2% (95% CI 79.4-80.9) of TTR, and group C 72.7% (95% CI 71.9-73.4) TTR. Groups A and B perform statistically significantly better than the conventional group C, with a difference of TTR of 7% points (p < 2.2 × 10(-16)), whereas no difference was seen between A and B. CONCLUSION: Home measurement of INR and the reporting and dosing of results online once a week increase TTR from 72% to 79% as compared to conventional computer-assisted monitoring in an anticoagulation clinic.
Authors: Mattias Wieloch; Andreas Hillarp; Karin Strandberg; Camilla Nilsson; Peter J Svensson Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Sam Schulman; Clive Kearon; Ajay K Kakkar; Patrick Mismetti; Sebastian Schellong; Henry Eriksson; David Baanstra; Janet Schnee; Samuel Z Goldhaber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mohamed A Soliman Hamad; Ellen van Eekelen; Ton van Agt; Albert H M van Straten Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2008-11-28 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2018-11-27
Authors: Carl J Heneghan; Josep M Garcia-Alamino; Elizabeth A Spencer; Alison M Ward; Rafael Perera; Clare Bankhead; Pablo Alonso-Coello; David Fitzmaurice; Kamal R Mahtani; Igho J Onakpoya Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-07-05