Literature DB >> 17263070

Testing the semantic differential as a model of task processes with the implicit association test.

Maggie J Xiong1, Gordon D Logan, Jeffery J Franks.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the hypothesis that semantic judgment tasks share overlapping processes if they require processing on common dimensions but not if they require processing on orthogonal dimensions in semantic space (Osgood, Suci, & Tannenbaum, 1957). We tested the hypothesis with the implicit association test (IATl Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) in three experiments. Consistent with the hypothesis, IAT effects (costs in reaction time because of incompatible response mapping between associated judgment tasks) occurred consistently when judgment tasks tapped into common semantic dimensions, whereas no IAT effect appeared when judgment tasks entailed processing on orthogonal semantic dimensions.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17263070     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

Review 1.  Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3.

Authors:  A G Greenwald; B A Nosek
Journal:  Z Exp Psychol       Date:  2001

2.  Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test.

Authors:  M C Steffens; I Plewe
Journal:  Z Exp Psychol       Date:  2001

3.  The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2002-06

4.  Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: a computational model.

Authors:  M J Frank; B Loughry; R C O'Reilly
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Repetition priming mediated by task similarity in semantic classification.

Authors:  Maggie J Xiong; Jeffery J Franks; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

6.  Tasks of a feather flock together: similarity effects in task switching.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Erik M Altmann; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

7.  The similarity paradox in human learning; a resolution.

Authors:  C E OSGOOD
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1949-05       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Multiple memory systems: what and why.

Authors:  L Nadel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests.

Authors:  C J Vaidya; J D Gabrieli; M M Keane; L A Monti; H Gutiérrez-Rivas; M M Zarella
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Divided attention: the whole is more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.