Literature DB >> 11392980

Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test.

M C Steffens1, I Plewe.   

Abstract

The introduction of the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) has stimulated numerous research activities. The IAT is supposed to measure the degree of association between concepts. Instances have to be assigned to these concepts by pressing appropriate keys as quickly as possible. The reaction time difference between certain conditions, termed the IAT effect, is used as an indicator of the degree of the concepts' association. We tested the hypothesis that the degree of association between one concept (or category) and the instances of the other presented concept also influences reaction times. In our experiment, the instances in the target categories, male and female names, were kept constant. The adjectives in the evaluative categories were manipulated: Either the pleasant adjectives were female-associated and the unpleasant adjectives were male-associated, or vice versa. These stereotypic associations were indeed found to exert a substantial influence on the size of the IAT effect. This finding casts doubt on the assumption that the IAT effect may be interpreted as a pure measure of the degree of association between concepts.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11392980     DOI: 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Exp Psychol        ISSN: 0949-3964


  12 in total

1.  Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.

Authors:  Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

2.  Does the compatibility effect in the race Implicit Association Test reflect familiarity or affect?

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Marie Peek-O'Leary
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

3.  Testing the semantic differential as a model of task processes with the implicit association test.

Authors:  Maggie J Xiong; Gordon D Logan; Jeffery J Franks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

4.  Malleability of Attitudes or Malleability of the IAT?

Authors:  H Anna Han; Sandor Czellar; Michael A Olson; Russell H Fazio
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-03-01

5.  Using the EZ-Diffusion Model to Score a Single-Category Implicit Association Test of Physical Activity.

Authors:  Amanda L Rebar; Nilam Ram; David E Conroy
Journal:  Psychol Sport Exerc       Date:  2015-03-01

6.  Is Kate Winslet more American than Lucy Liu? The impact of construal processes on the implicit ascription of a national identity.

Authors:  Thierry Devos; Debbie S Ma
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-07-07

7.  The good and the bad: Are some attribute words better than others in the Implicit Association Test?

Authors:  Jordan R Axt; Tony Y Feng; Yoav Bar-Anan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-05-04

8.  Neuroticism explains unwanted variance in Implicit Association Tests of personality: possible evidence for an affective valence confound.

Authors:  Monika Fleischhauer; Sören Enge; Robert Miller; Alexander Strobel; Anja Strobel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-30

9.  Abstract social categories facilitate access to socially skewed words.

Authors:  Jennifer Hay; Abby Walker; Kauyumari Sanchez; Kirsty Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identifying temporal and causal contributions of neural processes underlying the Implicit Association Test (IAT).

Authors:  Chad E Forbes; Katherine A Cameron; Jordan Grafman; Aron Barbey; Jeffrey Solomon; Walter Ritter; Daniel S Ruchkin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.