Literature DB >> 33404822

Nitrogen Assimilation Varies Among Clades of Nectar- and Insect-Associated Acinetobacters.

Sergio Álvarez-Pérez1,2, Kaoru Tsuji3, Marion Donald4, Ado Van Assche5, Rachel L Vannette6, Carlos M Herrera7, Hans Jacquemyn8, Tadashi Fukami9, Bart Lievens10.   

Abstract

Floral nectar is commonly colonized by yeasts and bacteria, whose growth largely depends on their capacity to assimilate nutrient resources, withstand high osmotic pressures, and cope with unbalanced carbon-to-nitrogen ratios. Although the basis of the ecological success of these microbes in the harsh environment of nectar is still poorly understood, it is reasonable to assume that they are efficient nitrogen scavengers that can consume a wide range of nitrogen sources in nectar. Furthermore, it can be hypothesized that phylogenetically closely related strains have more similar phenotypic characteristics than distant relatives. We tested these hypotheses by investigating the growth performance on different nitrogen-rich substrates of a collection of 82 acinetobacters isolated from nectar and honeybees, representing members of five species (Acinetobacter nectaris, A. boissieri, A. apis, and the recently described taxa A. bareti and A. pollinis). We also analyzed possible links between growth performance and phylogenetic affiliation of the isolates, while taking into account their geographical origin. Results demonstrated that the studied isolates could utilize a wide variety of nitrogen sources, including common metabolic by-products of yeasts (e.g., ammonium and urea), and that phylogenetic relatedness was associated with the variation in nitrogen assimilation among the studied acinetobacters. Finally, nutrient source and the origin (sample type and country) of isolates also predicted the ability of the acinetobacters to assimilate nitrogen-rich compounds. Overall, these results demonstrate inter-clade variation in the potential of the acinetobacters as nitrogen scavengers and suggest that nutritional dependences might influence interactions between bacteria and yeasts in floral nectar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acinetobacter; Floral nectar; Insect; Nitrogen assimilation; Phylogenetic signal; Trait differentiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33404822     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-020-01671-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  47 in total

1.  Scavengers that fit beneath a microscope lens.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 5.499

2.  Dispersal enhances beta diversity in nectar microbes.

Authors:  Rachel L Vannette; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 3.  Evolutionary ecology of nectar.

Authors:  Amy L Parachnowitsch; Jessamyn S Manson; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  Microbiology of sugar-rich environments: diversity, ecology and system constraints.

Authors:  Bart Lievens; John E Hallsworth; Maria I Pozo; Zouhaier Ben Belgacem; Andrew Stevenson; Kris A Willems; Hans Jacquemyn
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 5.491

5.  Flowers as islands: spatial distribution of nectar-inhabiting microfungi among plants of Mimulus aurantiacus, a hummingbird-pollinated shrub.

Authors:  Melinda Belisle; Kabir G Peay; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 6.  Yeast-Bacterium Interactions: The Next Frontier in Nectar Research.

Authors:  Sergio Álvarez-Pérez; Bart Lievens; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 18.313

7.  Inhospitable sweetness: nectar filtering of pollinator-borne inocula leads to impoverished, phylogenetically clustered yeast communities.

Authors:  Carlos M Herrera; Azucena Canto; María I Pozo; Pilar Bazaga
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Nectar yeasts: a natural microcosm for ecology.

Authors:  Callie R Chappell; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.239

9.  Towards a better understanding of the role of nectar-inhabiting yeasts in plant-animal interactions.

Authors:  Joon Klaps; Bart Lievens; Sergio Álvarez-Pérez
Journal:  Fungal Biol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-08

Review 10.  Nectar in Plant-Insect Mutualistic Relationships: From Food Reward to Partner Manipulation.

Authors:  Massimo Nepi; Donato A Grasso; Stefano Mancuso
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sugar Concentration, Nitrogen Availability, and Phylogenetic Factors Determine the Ability of Acinetobacter spp. and Rosenbergiella spp. to Grow in Floral Nectar.

Authors:  José R Morales-Poole; Clara de Vega; Kaoru Tsuji; Hans Jacquemyn; Robert R Junker; Carlos M Herrera; Chris Michiels; Bart Lievens; Sergio Álvarez-Pérez
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.192

Review 2.  Potential effects of nectar microbes on pollinator health.

Authors:  Valerie N Martin; Robert N Schaeffer; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Influential Insider: Wolbachia, an Intracellular Symbiont, Manipulates Bacterial Diversity in Its Insect Host.

Authors:  Morgane Ourry; Agathe Crosland; Valérie Lopez; Stéphane A P Derocles; Christophe Mougel; Anne-Marie Cortesero; Denis Poinsot
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.