Literature DB >> 11742397

Effect of acoustic clutter on prey detection by bats.

R Arlettaz1, G Jones, P A Racey.   

Abstract

Bats that capture animal prey from substrates often emit characteristic echolocation calls that are short-duration, frequency-modulated (FM) and broadband. Such calls seem to be suited to locating prey in uncluttered habitats, including flying prey, but may be less effective for finding prey among cluttered backgrounds because echoes reflecting from the substrate mask the acoustic signature of prey. Perhaps these call designs serve primarily for spatial orientation. Furthermore, it has been unclear whether the acoustic image conveyed by FM echoes enables fine texture discrimination, or whether gleaning bats that forage in echo-cluttering environments must locate prey by using other cues, such as prey-generated sounds. Here we show that two species of insectivorous gleaning bats perform badly when compelled to detect silent and immobile prey in clutter, but are very efficient at capturing noisy prey items among highly cluttered backgrounds, and both dead or live prey in uncluttered habitats. These findings suggest that the short, broadband FM echolocation calls associated with gleaning bats are not adapted to detecting prey in clutter.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11742397     DOI: 10.1038/414742a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  33 in total

1.  The effect of temporal structure on rustling-sound detection in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  M Hübner; L Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Object recognition by echolocation: a nectar-feeding bat exploiting the flowers of a rain forest vine.

Authors:  D von Helversen; O von Helversen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Frequency modulation patterns in the echolocation signals of two vespertilionid bats.

Authors:  Arjan Boonman; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Variability of the approach phase of landing echolocating Greater Mouse-eared bats.

Authors:  Mariana L Melcón; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler; Annette Denzinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Divergent trophic levels in two cryptic sibling bat species.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; Stefan Greif; Ivailo Borissov; Silke L Voigt-Heucke; Christian C Voigt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Sensory ecology of predator-prey interactions: responses of the AN2 interneuron in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus to the echolocation calls of sympatric bats.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; Cassandra Guignion
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  What noseleaves do for FM bats depends on their degree of sensorial specialization.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Fons De Mey; Herbert Peremans; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth Kalko; Uwe Firzlaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Vision complements echolocation in an aerial-hawking bat.

Authors:  Jens Rydell; Johan Eklöf
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2003-09-18

10.  Can two streams of auditory information be processed simultaneously? Evidence from the gleaning bat Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  J R Barber; K A Razak; Z M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.