Literature DB >> 17242952

Semiautomated digital analysis of knee joint space width using MR images.

Filippo Agnesi1, Kimberly K Amrami, Carlo A Frigo, Kenton R Kaufman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to (a) develop a semiautomated computer algorithm to measure knee joint space width (JSW) from magnetic resonance (MR) images using standard imaging techniques and (b) evaluate the reproducibility of the algorithm.
DESIGN: Using a standard clinical imaging protocol, bilateral knee MR images were obtained twice within a 2-week period from 17 asymptomatic research participants. Images were analyzed to determine the variability of the measurements performed by the program compared with the variability of manual measurements.
RESULTS: Measurement variability of the computer algorithm was considerably smaller than the variability of manual measurements. The average difference between two measurements of the same slice performed with the computer algorithm by the same user was 0.004 +/- 0.07 mm for the tibiofemoral joint (TF) and 0.009 +/- 0.11 mm for the patellofemoral joint (PF) compared with an average of 0.12 +/- 0.22 mm TF and 0.13 +/- 0.29 mm PF, respectively, for the manual method. Interuser variability of the computer algorithm was also considerably smaller, with an average difference of 0.004 +/- 0.1 mm TF and 0.0006 +/- 0.1 mm PF compared with 0.38 +/- 0.59 mm TF and 0.31 +/- 0.66 mm PF obtained using a manual method. The between-day reproducibility was larger but still within acceptable limits at 0.09 +/- 0.39 mm TF and 0.09 +/- 0.51 mm PF. This technique has proven consistently reproducible on a same slice base,while the reproducibility comparing different acquisitions of the same subject was larger. Longitudinal reproducibility improvement needs to be addressed through acquisition protocol improvements.
CONCLUSION: A semiautomated method for measuring knee JSW from MR images has been successfully developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17242952     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-006-0245-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  23 in total

1.  No loss of cartilage volume over three years in patients with knee osteoarthritis as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S J Gandy; P A Dieppe; M C Keen; R A Maciewicz; I Watt; J C Waterton
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Joint-space width in the axial view of the patello-femoral joint. Definitions and comparison with MR imaging.

Authors:  T Boegård; O Rudling; I F Petersson; J Sanfridsson; T Saxne; B Svensson; K Jonsson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Thrust during ambulation and the progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Alison Chang; Karen Hayes; Dorothy Dunlop; Debra Hurwitz; Jing Song; September Cahue; Ronuk Genge; Leena Sharma
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-12

4.  Longitudinal study of magnetic resonance imaging and standard X-rays to assess disease progression in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  O Bruyere; H Genant; M Kothari; S Zaim; D White; C Peterfy; N Burlet; F Richy; D Ethgen; T Montague; C Dabrowski; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients.

Authors:  M Morlock; E Schneider; A Bluhm; M Vollmer; G Bergmann; V Müller; M Honl
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging.

Authors:  F Eckstein; J Westhoff; H Sittek; K P Maag; M Haubner; S Faber; K H Englmeier; M Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Assessment of cartilage volume in the femorotibial joint with magnetic resonance imaging and 3D computer reconstruction.

Authors:  L Pilch; C Stewart; D Gordon; R Inman; K Parsons; I Pataki; J Stevens
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation.

Authors:  C G Peterfy; C F van Dijke; D L Janzen; C C Glüer; R Namba; S Majumdar; P Lang; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking.

Authors:  O D Schipplein; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of cartilage thickness with radiologic grade of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Filippo Agnesi; Kimberly K Amrami; Carlo A Frigo; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Short-term repeatability of joint space width measurements using a magnetic resonance imaging compatible knee positioning device.

Authors:  M F Koff; D W Stanley; P J Weishaar; K K Amrami; K R Kaufman
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

Review 3.  Non-invasive and in vivo assessment of osteoarthritic articular cartilage: a review on MRI investigations.

Authors:  Ahmad Fadzil Mohd Hani; Dileep Kumar; Aamir Saeed Malik; Raja Mohd Kamil Raja Ahmad; Ruslan Razak; Azman Kiflie
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 2.631

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.