Literature DB >> 17241366

Fidelity of bacterial source tracking: Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp and minimizing assignment of isolates from nonlibrary sources.

W M Hassan1, R D Ellender, S Y Wang.   

Abstract

AIMS: The goal of the study was to improve the fidelity of library-dependent bacterial source tracking efforts in determining sources of faecal pollution. The first objective was to compare the fidelity of source assignments using Escherichia coli vs Enterococcus spp. The second objective was to determine the efficacy of using thresholds during source assignments to reduce the rate of misassignments when nonlibrary isolates (i.e. isolates from animals not used in building the identification library) are present. METHODS AND
RESULTS: E. coli and Enterococcus isolates from 784 human, cow, deer, dog, chicken, and gull faecal samples were fingerprinted using BOX-PCR. Jack-knife analysis of the fingerprints showed that the overall rate of correct assignment (ORCA) of 867 E. coli isolates was 67% compared with 82% for 1020 Enterococcus isolates. In a separate blind test using similarity value and quality factor thresholds, the ORCA of 130 E. coli and 131 Enterococcus isolates were 70% and 98%, respectively. The use of these thresholds reduced misassignment of 262 nonlibrary enterococcal isolates from horses, goats, pigs, bats, squirrels, ducks, geese, and migratory song birds. Misassignment was reduced from 100% when thresholds were not used, to 47% using similarity threshold alone, and to 12% when both thresholds were used.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of enterococci provides higher rates of correct source assignment compared with E. coli. The use of similarity thresholds to decide whether to accept source assignments made by computer programmes reduces the rate of misassignment of nonlibrary isolates. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Although both E. coli and Enterococcus spp. are still used in microbial source tracking, the use of enterococci should be preferred over the use of E. coli in DNA fingerprint-based efforts. In addition, because environmental isolates are not limited to those from animals used to build source tracking libraries, similarity thresholds should be used during source assignments to reduce the rate of misassignments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17241366     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03077.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of genotypic and phylogenetic relationships of environmental Enterococcus isolates by BOX-PCR typing and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Authors:  Bina S Nayak; Brian Badgley; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A comparison of BOX-PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to determine genetic relatedness of enterococci from different environments.

Authors:  Charlene R Jackson; Vesna Furtula; Erin G Farrell; John B Barrett; Lari M Hiott; Patricia Chambers
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination.

Authors:  Camila Carlos; Mathias M Pires; Nancy C Stoppe; Elayse M Hachich; Maria I Z Sato; Tânia A T Gomes; Luiz A Amaral; Laura M M Ottoboni
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  PCR Assay Specific for Chicken Feces.

Authors:  Cindy R Cisar; Tatsuya Akiyama; Jonathan Hatley; Lori Arney; Nebojsa Kezunovic; Daniel Owen
Journal:  Proc Okla Acad Sci       Date:  2010

5.  Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations.

Authors:  Kristin Tormoehlen; Yvette J Johnson-Walker; Emily W Lankau; Maung San Myint; John A Herrmann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Genetic mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance identified in Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, and Enteroccocus spp. isolated from U.S. food animals.

Authors:  Jonathan G Frye; Charlene R Jackson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.