Literature DB >> 12160503

If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?

Glenn A Loomis1, J Scott Ries, Robert M Saywell, Nitesh R Thakker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The chasm theory of marketing states that fundamental differences exist between early adopters of technology and the mainstream marketplace, making it difficult for technology to transition to the mainstream market. We investigated possible differences in attitudes and beliefs about electronic medical records (EMRs) between current EMR users (early market) and nonusers (mainstream market). STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional mail survey. POPULATION: Active members in the Indiana Academy of Family Physicians 2000-2001 membership database (N = 1328). OUTCOMES MEASURED: Differences in attitudes, beliefs, and demographic characteristics of EMR users and nonusers.
RESULTS: The overall return rate was 51.7%; 14.4% of respondents currently use an EMR. Electronic medical record users were more likely to practice in urban areas or to be hospital-based and reported seeing fewer patients. Nonusers were less likely to believe that (1) physicians should computerize their medical records; (2) current EMRs are a useful tool for physicians; (3) EMRs improve quality of medical records and decrease errors; and (4) it is easy to enter data into current EMRs. Nonusers were more likely to believe that paper records are more secure and more confidential than EMRs. Both users and nonusers believed that current EMRs are too expensive.
CONCLUSIONS: A chasm exists between EMR users and nonusers regarding issues that affect EMR implementation, including necessity, usefulness, data entry, cost, security and confidentiality. To reach full implementation of EMRs in family medicine, organizations should use these data to target their research, education, and marketing efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12160503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  44 in total

Review 1.  Using electronic health records to help coordinate care.

Authors:  Lynda C Burton; Gerard F Anderson; Irvin W Kues
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Use of health information technology by office-based physicians: comparison of two contemporaneous public-use physician surveys.

Authors:  Chenghui Li
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2011-10-01

3.  Workflow and electronic health records in small medical practices.

Authors:  Mala Ramaiah; Eswaran Subrahmanian; Ram D Sriram; Bettijoyce B Lide
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-04-01

4.  EHR acceptance factors in ambulatory care: a survey of physician perceptions.

Authors:  Mary E Morton; Susan Wiedenbeck
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2010-01-01

5.  Adoption and Barriers to Adoption of Electronic Health Records by Nurses in Three Governmental Hospitals in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Azza El Mahalli
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2015-11-01

6.  Surgeons' perspective of a newly initiated electronic medical record.

Authors:  Richard Frazee; Laura Harmon; Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2016-01

7.  Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: when will health care be paperless?

Authors:  Eric W Ford; Nir Menachemi; M Thad Phillips
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Quality of work life of independent vs employed family physicians in Wisconsin: a WReN study.

Authors:  John W Beasley; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Mary Ellen Hagenauer; Lucille Marchand; Francois Sainfort
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 9.  Computer-assisted technology: not if, not when, but how. A systematic review of interactive computer-assisted technology in diabetes care.

Authors:  Jaan Sidorov
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Are three methods better than one? A comparative assessment of usability evaluation methods in an EHR.

Authors:  Muhammad F Walji; Elsbeth Kalenderian; Mark Piotrowski; Duong Tran; Krishna K Kookal; Oluwabunmi Tokede; Joel M White; Ram Vaderhobli; Rachel Ramoni; Paul C Stark; Nicole S Kimmes; Maxim Lagerweij; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.