BACKGROUND: The costs and limitations of clinical encounter documentation using dictation/transcription have provided impetus for increased use of computerized structured data entry to enforce standardization and improve quality. The purpose of the present study is to compare exam report quality of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability exams documented by computerized protocol-guided templates with exams documented in the usual fashion (dictation). METHODS: Exam report quality for 17,490 VA compensation and pension (C&P) disability exams reviewed in 2005 was compared for exam reports completed by template and exam reports completed in routine fashion (dictation). An additional set of 2,903 exams reviewed for quality the last three months of 2004 were used for baseline comparison. RESULTS: Mean template quality scores of 91 (95% CI 89, 92) showed significant improvement over routine exams conducted during the study period 78 (95% CI 77, 78) and at baseline 73 (95% CI 72, 75). The quality difference among examination types is presented. DISCUSSION: The results of the present study suggest that use of the standardized, guided documentation templates in VA disability exams produces significant improvement in quality compared with routinely completed exams (dictation). The templates demonstrate the opportunity and capacity for informatics tools to enhance delivery of care when operating in a health system with a sophisticated electronic medical record.
BACKGROUND: The costs and limitations of clinical encounter documentation using dictation/transcription have provided impetus for increased use of computerized structured data entry to enforce standardization and improve quality. The purpose of the present study is to compare exam report quality of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability exams documented by computerized protocol-guided templates with exams documented in the usual fashion (dictation). METHODS: Exam report quality for 17,490 VA compensation and pension (C&P) disability exams reviewed in 2005 was compared for exam reports completed by template and exam reports completed in routine fashion (dictation). An additional set of 2,903 exams reviewed for quality the last three months of 2004 were used for baseline comparison. RESULTS: Mean template quality scores of 91 (95% CI 89, 92) showed significant improvement over routine exams conducted during the study period 78 (95% CI 77, 78) and at baseline 73 (95% CI 72, 75). The quality difference among examination types is presented. DISCUSSION: The results of the present study suggest that use of the standardized, guided documentation templates in VA disability exams produces significant improvement in quality compared with routinely completed exams (dictation). The templates demonstrate the opportunity and capacity for informatics tools to enhance delivery of care when operating in a health system with a sophisticated electronic medical record.
Authors: William Brinson Weeks; Peter Donald Mills; Julia Waldron; Steven Holloway Brown; Theodore Speroff; Lewis R Coulson Journal: J Healthc Manag Date: 2003 Jul-Aug
Authors: Kevin A Kerber; Timothy P Hofer; William J Meurer; A Mark Fendrick; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-03-24 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Grace W Ma; Amandeep Pooni; Shawn S Forbes; Cagla Eskicioglu; Emily Pearsall; Fred D Brenneman; Robin S McLeod Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: S Trent Rosenbloom; Steven H Brown; David Froehling; Brent A Bauer; Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler; William M Gregg; Peter L Elkin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2008-10-24 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Lori M Gawron; Sara Simonsen; Morgan M Millar; Jessica Lewis-Caporal; Shardool Patel; Rebecca G Simmons Journal: South Med J Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Brett R South; Shuying Shen; Makoto Jones; Jennifer Garvin; Matthew H Samore; Wendy W Chapman; Adi V Gundlapalli Journal: Summit Transl Bioinform Date: 2009-03-01
Authors: Brett R South; Shuying Shen; Makoto Jones; Jennifer Garvin; Matthew H Samore; Wendy W Chapman; Adi V Gundlapalli Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2009-09-17 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Jue Cao; Ryan Farmer; Patrick M Carry; Maria Goodfellow; David C Gerhardt; Frank Scott; Travis Heare; Nancy H Miller Journal: JB JS Open Access Date: 2017-10-05