Literature DB >> 101723

Quality assurance through automated monitoring and concurrent feedback using a computer-based medical information system.

G O Barnett, R Winickoff, J L Dorsey, M M Morgan, R S Lurie.   

Abstract

A computer-based medical information system (COSTAR) has been used to support a quality assurance program where the data collection is an integral part of the patient care recording activity and, therefore, does not require a separate abstracting or encoding process. This program utilizes concurrent audit to detect deficiencies in patient care, and automatic rapid feedback to the responsible provider in time to allow the provider to correct the deficiency. This system has been demonstrated to improve follow-up of throat cultures, positive for Group A Beta hemolytic streptococcus. It is well accepted by the medical staff whose practice is being audited. Because the data are collected as part of the routine operation of COSTAR, the computer monitoring and feedback have only a small incremental cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 101723     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-197811000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  36 in total

1.  Three decades of research on computer applications in health care: medical informatics support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Authors:  J Michael Fitzmaurice; Karen Adams; John M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Knowledge bases in medicine: a review.

Authors:  C A Perry
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1990-07

3.  The cost effectiveness of drug utilisation review in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  D H Kreling; D A Mott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Pharmacoeconomic consequences of measurement and modification of hospital drug use.

Authors:  L L Ioannides-Demos; G M Eckert; A J McLean
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

Review 6.  Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

Review 7.  Implementing guidelines in general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

8.  The effect of standardized, computer-guided templates on quality of VA disability exams.

Authors:  Elliot M Fielstein; Steven H Brown; Caroll S McBrine; Terry K Clark; Shawn P Hardenbrook; Ted Speroff
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

Review 9.  Systematic review of economic evaluations and cost analyses of guideline implementation strategies.

Authors:  Luke Vale; Ruth Thomas; Graeme MacLennan; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-03-09

10.  The role of computers in preventive medicine in a rural family practice.

Authors:  W Hogg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.