Literature DB >> 12908225

A model for improving the quality and timeliness of compensation and pension examinations in VA facilities.

William Brinson Weeks1, Peter Donald Mills, Julia Waldron, Steven Holloway Brown, Theodore Speroff, Lewis R Coulson.   

Abstract

In response to external and internal customer dissatisfaction and in anticipation of markedly higher volumes of examination requests, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) produced an eight-month facilitated quality-improvement project designed to improve the quality and timeliness of compensation examination processing. To determine whether participation in the project was associated with better outcomes and to identify team characteristics that were associated with high performance, we obtained centrally collected facility-level performance measures on quality and timeliness of the examinations. To determine factors associated with team success, we compared measures of leadership support reported by teams with high and low performance outcomes. Thirty teams representing 34 VA medical centers and 22 Veterans Benefits Administration's regional offices participated in the project. Monthly volumes were significantly higher for participating teams, and volumes increased significantly over time for both groups. At the beginning of the project, examination timeliness was substantially worse for participating teams (34.1 versus 29.9 days, p = .03); by the end, participants had better performance (28.5 versus 30.3 days, p = .00). Quality measures were maintained. By the end of the project, high performers reported improved leadership, frontline support, resource availability, alignment with strategic goals, and leadership mandate when compared to performance at the beginning of the project; low performers reported the opposite. These results suggest that the principles of clinical improvement can be applied successfully to teach teams how to achieve process improvements within a large healthcare organization. Visible, ongoing support by leadership and alignment of project objectives with strategic goals are associated with improved project outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12908225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Manag        ISSN: 1096-9012


  4 in total

Review 1.  The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Heather C Kaplan; Patrick W Brady; Michele C Dritz; David K Hooper; W Matthew Linam; Craig M Froehle; Peter Margolis
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  The effect of standardized, computer-guided templates on quality of VA disability exams.

Authors:  Elliot M Fielstein; Steven H Brown; Caroll S McBrine; Terry K Clark; Shawn P Hardenbrook; Ted Speroff
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

3.  eQuality for all: Extending automated quality measurement of free text clinical narratives.

Authors:  Steven H Brown; Peter L Elkin; S Trent Rosenbloom; Elliot Fielstein; Ted Speroff
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

4.  Measuring sustainability within the Veterans Administration Mental Health System Redesign initiative.

Authors:  James H Ford; Dean Krahn; Meg Wise; Karen Anderson Oliver
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.926

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.