Literature DB >> 12111014

Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans.

C Bergot1, V Bousson, A Meunier, M Laval-Jeantet, J D Laredo.   

Abstract

In this retrospective study of hip fracture risk evaluation from hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, our objectives were to determine which part of the femoral neck length contributes most to the fracture risk and to define a geometric parameter better than hip axis length (HAL) for discriminating hip fracture patients. Forty-nine Caucasian women with a nontraumatic femoral neck fracture were matched on age to 49 normal women and on both age and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) to 49 unfractured women. In addition to BMD, geometric parameters including neck-shaft angle, neck width and several HAL segments were evaluated by discriminant analysis to determine which was the best hip fracture discriminator. Neck-shaft angle had a limited influence on the hip fracture risk. Age-related bone loss was associated with a neck width increase in unfractured and fractured patients. HAL was significantly longer in fractured patients and was a significant discriminator between fractured patients and normal controls. HAL was not significant as a discriminator between fractured and low-BMD unfractured patients. The intertrochanter-head center distance (from the intertrochanteric line to the femoral head center) coincides with the femoral lever arm and includes no segments that adapt to BMD changes, such as the greater trochanter-intertrochanter distance. Among all tested lengths, this segment was the part of HAL that discriminated best between fractured and low-BMD unfractured patients. A longer intertrochanter-head center distance increased the risk of femoral neck fracture among low-BMD patients. Including automatic measurement of this segment in standard DXA protocols may prove useful in identifying patients at high risk for hip fracture. At present, HAL remains the easier neck length to measure, but automatic evaluation of the intertrochanter-head center distance must be a goal for future image analysis development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12111014     DOI: 10.1007/s001980200071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  44 in total

1.  Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture.

Authors:  Pasi Pulkkinen; Juha Partanen; Pekka Jalovaara; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device.

Authors:  S Kolta; A Le Bras; D Mitton; V Bousson; J A de Guise; J Fechtenbaum; J D Laredo; C Roux; W Skalli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Image resolution and magnification using a cone beam densitometer: optimizing data acquisition for hip morphometric analysis.

Authors:  V Boudousq; D Mariano Goulart; J M Dinten; C Caderas de Kerleau; E Thomas; O Mares; P O Kotzki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone geometry and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  [New techniques for the diagnosis of osteoporosis].

Authors:  A S Issever; T M Link
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  New laboratory tools in the assessment of bone quality.

Authors:  D Chappard; M F Baslé; E Legrand; M Audran
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Expected frequency of biomechanically adverse values of proximal femur geometric variables for fracture risk in the East Slovak female population (epidemiological study).

Authors:  Jaroslava Wendlová
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-29

8.  Pleiotropic effects of obesity on fracture risk: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Shinya Ishii; Jane A Cauley; Gail A Greendale; Carrie Nielsen; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez; Kristine Ruppert; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Differences in hip bone mineral density may explain the hip fracture pattern in osteoarthritic hips.

Authors:  Olof Wolf; Håkan Ström; Jan Milbrink; Sune Larsson; Hans Mallmin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.