Literature DB >> 17235661

Vaginal pressure during daily activities before and after vaginal repair.

Lone Mouritsen1, Mette Hulbaek, Søren Brostrøm, Jeanette Bogstad.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to measure vaginal pressure during various daily activities in patients before and after vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, searching data for evidence-based activity guidelines. Vaginal pressure (VP) was studied in 23 patients during activities such as rest, pelvic floor contraction (PFC), coughing, Valsalva, rising from sitting to standing and lifting 2 and 5 kg with four different lifting techniques. VP was measured before, 1-5 days and 4-6 weeks after vaginal repair. Mean VP was four to five times higher during coughing and Valsalva compared to PFC and lifting 2 and 5 kg. Lifting in the walking position created a slightly higher VP compared to other lifting techniques, which did not differ. The VP did not increase when lifting 5 kg compared to 2 kg. Mean VP during coughing and Valsalva were significantly lower 1-5 days after the operation. VP was not related to the type of vaginal repair. The results imply that post-operative counselling should concentrate more on treating chronic cough and constipation than restrictions of moderate physical activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17235661     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-006-0267-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  13 in total

1.  Substantial variability in postoperative treatment, and convalescence recommendations following vaginal repair. A nationwide questionnaire study.

Authors:  M Ottesen; C Møller; H Kehlet; B Ottesen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Pelvic floor and abdominal muscle interaction: EMG activity and intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  P Neumann; V Gill
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2002

3.  The effects of breath control on intra-abdominal pressure during lifting tasks.

Authors:  Marshall Hagins; Markus Pietrek; Ali Sheikhzadeh; Margareta Nordin; Kenneth Axen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The relationship of body mass index to intra-abdominal pressure as measured by multichannel cystometry.

Authors:  K L Noblett; J K Jensen; D R Ostergard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

5.  Reproducibility of intra-abdominal pressure when lifting.

Authors:  P Mairiaux; J Malchaire; D Vandiepenbeeck; L Bellelahom
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1988

6.  Postoperative activity restrictions: any evidence?

Authors:  Larissa F Weir; Ingrid E Nygaard; Jason Wilken; Debra Brandt; Kathleen F Janz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Fast track vaginal surgery.

Authors:  Marianne Ottesen; Mette Sørensen; Yvonne Rasmussen; Steen Smidt-Jensen; Henrik Kehlet; Bent Ottesen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Short convalescence after vaginal prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Marianne Ottesen; Mette Sørensen; Henrik Kehlet; Bent Ottesen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Heavy lifting at work and risk of genital prolapse and herniated lumbar disc in assistant nurses.

Authors:  S Jørgensen; H O Hein; F Gyntelberg
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.611

10.  Are vaginal and rectal pressures equivalent approximations of one another for the purpose of performing subtracted cystometry?

Authors:  L L Wall; J K Hewitt; M J Helms
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Pearls and pitfalls of mesh surgery.

Authors:  Ajay Rane; Jay Iyer
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-01-05

2.  More complicated than it looks: the vagaries of calculating intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw; Ingrid E Nygaard; Tanner J Coleman; Yvonne Hsu; Marlene Egger; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Clinical evaluation of a wireless intra-vaginal pressure transducer.

Authors:  Yvonne Hsu; Tanner J Coleman; Robert W Hitchcock; Kristina Heintz; Janet M Shaw; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Activity restrictions after gynecologic surgery: is there evidence?

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Should women with incontinence and prolapse do abdominal curls?

Authors:  Sally Simpson; Michelle Deeble; Judith Thompson; Anne Andrews; Kathy Briffa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Design and development of a novel intra-vaginal pressure sensor.

Authors:  Jennifer Kruger; Lynsey Hayward; Poul Nielsen; Denis Loiselle; Robert Kirton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Risk factors for pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy.

Authors:  Roberta E Blandon; Adil E Bharucha; L Joseph Melton; Cathy D Schleck; Alan R Zinsmeister; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Effects of mechanical stretching on the morphology and cytoskeleton of vaginal fibroblasts from women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Sumei Wang; Zhenyu Zhang; Dongyuan Lü; Qiuxiang Xu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Is Physical Activity Good or Bad for the Female Pelvic Floor? A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Kari Bø; Ingrid Elisabeth Nygaard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Role of fibulin-5 insufficiency and prolapse progression on murine vaginal biomechanical function.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Clark-Patterson; Sambit Roy; Laurephile Desrosiers; Leise R Knoepp; Aritro Sen; Kristin S Miller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.