OBJECTIVE: Retrospectively to describe the recommended convalescence according to patients who had undergone vaginal prolapse surgery in 1996-98, and prospectively to describe the need for and limiting factors for convalescence after vaginal prolapse surgery in 1999-2000 at a Danish University Hospital. METHODS: The retrospective study included a validated, postal, questionnaire and review of patient files. In the prospective study, we followed consecutive women after vaginal surgery in a fast-track setting using a multimodal rehabilitation model with well-defined recommendations for the convalescence period. RESULTS: In the retrospective study, 188 women (79%) with a median age of 66 years (range, 30-88) answered the questionnaire. They had been recommended a convalescence of median 6 weeks (range, 1-12) for most activities. The subjective recurrence rate was 22% within median 6 months (range, 0-24) after first-time prolapse surgery. In the prospective study, there were 41 consecutive women with a median age of 69 years (range, 44-88). Convalescence was median <1 week for most non-strenuous activities, <2 weeks for light work and <4 weeks for sexual intercourse, sports and work with lifts exceeding 10 kg. Limiting factors were fatigue and pain. The 1-year subjective recurrence rate was 17%. CONCLUSION: Traditionally, recommended convalescence has been median 6 weeks after vaginal prolapse surgery. Convalescence has been shortened to 1-3 weeks with a multimodal rehabilitation model with revised, non-restrictive recommendations. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of different convalescence recommendations on the recurrence of prolapse.
OBJECTIVE: Retrospectively to describe the recommended convalescence according to patients who had undergone vaginal prolapse surgery in 1996-98, and prospectively to describe the need for and limiting factors for convalescence after vaginal prolapse surgery in 1999-2000 at a Danish University Hospital. METHODS: The retrospective study included a validated, postal, questionnaire and review of patient files. In the prospective study, we followed consecutive women after vaginal surgery in a fast-track setting using a multimodal rehabilitation model with well-defined recommendations for the convalescence period. RESULTS: In the retrospective study, 188 women (79%) with a median age of 66 years (range, 30-88) answered the questionnaire. They had been recommended a convalescence of median 6 weeks (range, 1-12) for most activities. The subjective recurrence rate was 22% within median 6 months (range, 0-24) after first-time prolapse surgery. In the prospective study, there were 41 consecutive women with a median age of 69 years (range, 44-88). Convalescence was median <1 week for most non-strenuous activities, <2 weeks for light work and <4 weeks for sexual intercourse, sports and work with lifts exceeding 10 kg. Limiting factors were fatigue and pain. The 1-year subjective recurrence rate was 17%. CONCLUSION: Traditionally, recommended convalescence has been median 6 weeks after vaginal prolapse surgery. Convalescence has been shortened to 1-3 weeks with a multimodal rehabilitation model with revised, non-restrictive recommendations. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of different convalescence recommendations on the recurrence of prolapse.
Authors: O Gralla; F Haas; N Knoll; D Hadzidiakos; M Tullmann; A Romer; S Deger; V Ebeling; M Lein; A Wille; B Rehberg; S A Loening; J Roigas Journal: World J Urol Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Miles Murphy; Cedric Olivera; Thomas Wheeler; Elizabeth Casiano; Nazema Siddiqui; Rajiv Gala; Tondalaya Gamble; Ethan M Balk; Vivian W Sung Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Tanner J Coleman; Ingrid E Nygaard; Dannielle N Holder; Marlene J Egger; Robert Hitchcock Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Hans A M Brölmann; Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; David J Bruinvels; Riekie H C de Vet; Amarantha A Dirksz; Judith A F Huirne Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Judith A F Huirne; Carina A Pittens; Willem van Mechelen; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Hans A M Brölmann; Johannes R Anema Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-10-19 Impact factor: 5.428