Literature DB >> 18446390

Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal.

Lennart Flygare1, Anders Ohman.   

Abstract

The aims of this paper were to critically review the role of radiographic imaging before lower third molar removal and to suggest a strategy for preoperative imaging based on available scientific evidence and clinical experience. Original articles and reviews including the MESH terms "third molar" and "radiography" were selected from the Medline database. Other sources were taken from references of selected papers. It was found that the scientific evidence on the usefulness of different preoperative imaging techniques of wisdom teeth is low. Therefore, information gathered from the literature was combined with the authors' clinical experience to suggest a strategy for preoperative imaging of lower third molars. Currently available radiological techniques used for preoperative imaging of lower third molars are also presented. It is suggested that panoramic and/or intraoral radiographs are sufficient as preoperative imaging in the vast majority of cases where there is no overlap between the mandibular canal and the wisdom tooth. Supplement with a posteroanterior open mouth projection will solve most of the remaining cases. In a restricted number of cases where there is an intimate relationship between the mandibular canal and the wisdom tooth, volume tomography such as cone beam computed tomography or low-dose computed tomography is indicated.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18446390     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-008-0200-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  75 in total

1.  Accuracy of digital and film panoramic radiographs for assessment of position and morphology of mandibular third molars and prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies.

Authors:  I S Benediktsdottir; H Hintze; J K Petersen; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Cross-sectional tomography. A diagnostic technique for determining the buccolingual relationship of impacted mandibular third molars and the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle.

Authors:  C S Miller; P V Nummikoski; D A Barnett; R P Langlais
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1990-12

3.  Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction.

Authors:  Michael Sedaghatfar; Meredith A August; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty.

Authors:  Srinivas M Susarla; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Comparison of film, direct digital, and tuned-aperture computed tomography images to identify the location of crestal defects around endosseous titanium implants.

Authors:  R L Webber; R A Horton; T E Underhill; J B Ludlow; D A Tyndall
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1996-04

6.  Reduced radiation-absorbed dose to tissues with partial panoramic radiography for evaluation of third molars.

Authors:  L T Kircos; W S Eakle; R A Smith
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Brief communication: possible third molar impactions in the hominid fossil record.

Authors:  K R Gibson; J M Calcagno
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  Evaluation of a new radiographic technique: outcome following removal of mandibular third molars.

Authors:  A Wenzel; E Aagaard; S Sindet-Pedersen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction.

Authors:  Olalekan Micah Gbotolorun; Godwin Toyin Arotiba; Akinola Ladipo Ladeinde
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery.

Authors:  J P Rood; B A Shehab
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.651

View more
  28 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Assessing the need for computed tomography for lower-third-molar extraction: a survey among 322 dentists.

Authors:  S Sivolella; G Boccuzzo; E Gasparini; G De Conti; M Berengo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Correlation of mandibular impacted tooth and bone morphology determined by cone beam computed topography on a premise of third molar operation.

Authors:  M A Momin; K Matsumoto; K Ejima; R Asaumi; T Kawai; Y Arai; K Honda; T Yosue
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal.

Authors:  L H Matzen; J Christensen; H Hintze; S Schou; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Accuracy of the vertical tube shift method in identifying the relationship between the third molars and the mandibular canal.

Authors:  Sergio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz; Anne Caroline Costa Oenning; Marcela Graciano Felizardo; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Deborah Queiroz de Freitas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence.

Authors:  L H Matzen; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Audit of a 5-year radiographic protocol for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgical intervention.

Authors:  L H Matzen; S Schou; J Christensen; H Hintze; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Prevention of neurological injuries during mandibular third molar surgery: technical notes.

Authors:  Gerardo La Monaca; Iole Vozza; Rita Giardino; Susanna Annibali; Nicola Pranno; Maria Paola Cristalli
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2017-11-08

9.  3D imaging reconstruction and impacted third molars: case reports.

Authors:  Andrea Tuzi; Roberto Di Bari; Andrea Cicconetti
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-01-14

10.  Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Guerrero; Raul Botetano; Jorge Beltran; Keith Horner; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.