Literature DB >> 17229874

Choosing a radiology workstation: technical and clinical considerations.

Elizabeth A Krupinski1, Maria Kallergi.   

Abstract

Choosing a workstation for daily use in the interpretation of digital radiologic images can be a daunting task. There are numerous products available on the market, but differentiating among them and deciding on what is best for a particular environment can be confusing and frustrating. There is no "one-size-fits-all" workstation, so users must consider a variety of factors when choosing a workstation. This review summarizes the critical elements in a radiology workstation and the characteristics one should be aware of and look for in the selection of a workstation. Issues pertaining to both hardware and software aspects of medical workstations, including interface design, are reviewed, particularly as they may affect the interpretation process. (c) RSNA, 2007.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17229874     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2423051403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

1.  Empirical investigation of radiologists' priorities for PACS selection: an analytical hierarchy process approach.

Authors:  Vivek Joshi; Kyootai Lee; David Melson; Vamsi R Narra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Human-computer interaction in radiotherapy target volume delineation: a prospective, multi-institutional comparison of user input devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  The Medical Image Perception Society update on key issues for image perception research.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Evaluation of stylus for radiographic image annotation.

Authors:  Gautam S Muralidhar; Gary J Whitman; Tamara Miner Haygood; Tanya W Stephens; Alan C Bovik; Mia K Markey
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Alternative user interface devices for improved navigation of CT datasets.

Authors:  M Lidén; T Andersson; H Geijer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Visual Search Efficiency: Single 8 MP vs. Dual 5 MP Displays.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  PACS administrators' and radiologists' perspective on the importance of features for PACS selection.

Authors:  Vivek Joshi; Vamsi R Narra; Kailash Joshi; Kyootai Lee; David Melson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  The Empirical Foundations of Teleradiology and Related Applications: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; James H Thrall; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.536

9.  Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum; Robert T Caldwell; Kevin M Schartz; John Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Measurement of visual strain in radiologists.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.