Literature DB >> 19949832

Alternative user interface devices for improved navigation of CT datasets.

M Lidén1, T Andersson, H Geijer.   

Abstract

The workflow in radiology departments has changed dramatically with the transition to digital PACS, especially with the shift from tile mode to stack mode display of volumetric images. With the increasing number of images in routinely captured datasets, the standard user interface devices (UIDs) become inadequate. One basic approach to improve the navigation of the stack mode datasets is to take advantage of alternative UIDs developed for other domains, such as the computer game industry. We evaluated three UIDs both in clinical practice and in a task-based experiment. After using the devices in the daily image interpretation work, the readers reported that both of the tested alternative UIDs were better in terms of ergonomics compared to the standard mouse and that both alternatives were more efficient when reviewing large CT datasets. In the task-based experiment, one of the tested devices was faster than the standard mouse, while the other alternative was not significantly faster. One of the tested alternative devices showed a larger number of traversed images during the task. The results indicate that alternative user interface devices can improve the navigation of stack mode datasets and that radiologists should consider the potential benefits of alternatives to the standard mouse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19949832      PMCID: PMC3046793          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-009-9252-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  8 in total

Review 1.  Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT.

Authors:  G D Rubin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Evolution of the digital revolution: a radiologist perspective.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Eliot L Siegel; Khan Siddiqui
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Importance and effects of altered workplace ergonomics in modern radiology suites.

Authors:  Mukesh G Harisinghani; Michael A Blake; Mansi Saksena; Peter F Hahn; Debra Gervais; Michael Zalis; Leonor da Silva Dias Fernandes; Peter R Mueller
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Alternative input devices for efficient navigation of large CT angiography data sets.

Authors:  Anthony J Sherbondy; Djamila Holmlund; Geoffrey D Rubin; Pamela K Schraedley; Terry Winograd; Sandy Napel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Choosing a radiology workstation: technical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Maria Kallergi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Addressing the coming radiology crisis-the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology transforming the radiological interpretation process (TRIP) initiative.

Authors:  Katherine P Andriole; Richard L Morin; Ronald L Arenson; John A Carrino; Bradley J Erickson; Steven C Horii; David W Piraino; Bruce I Reiner; J Anthony Seibert; Eliot Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Evaluating interaction techniques for stack mode viewing.

Authors:  M Stella Atkins; Jennifer Fernquist; Arthur E Kirkpatrick; Bruce B Forster
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Radiologist assessment of PACS user interface devices.

Authors:  David L Weiss; Khan M Siddiqui; Joe Scopelliti
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.532

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Factors Affecting Radiologist's PACS Usage.

Authors:  Daniel Forsberg; Beverly Rosipko; Jeffrey L Sunshine
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Of Mice and Roentgen: Radiologist Satisfaction with a Non-conventional 13-Button Mouse-One Institution's Experience.

Authors:  Kevin Denton; Irfanullah Haider; Jacqueline Hill; Suzanne L Hunt; Ryan Ash
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Clinical evaluation of semi-automatic landmark-based lesion tracking software for CT-scans.

Authors:  Peter Dankerl; Alexander Cavallaro; Matthias Dietzel; Alexey Tsymbal; Martin Kramer; Sascha Seifert; Michael Uder; Matthias Hammon
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.909

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.