Literature DB >> 24744278

PACS administrators' and radiologists' perspective on the importance of features for PACS selection.

Vivek Joshi1, Vamsi R Narra, Kailash Joshi, Kyootai Lee, David Melson.   

Abstract

Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) play a critical role in radiology. This paper presents the criteria important to PACS administrators for selecting a PACS. A set of criteria are identified and organized into an integrative hierarchical framework. Survey responses from 48 administrators are used to identify the relative weights of these criteria through an analytical hierarchy process. The five main dimensions for PACS selection in order of importance are system continuity and functionality, system performance and architecture, user interface for workflow management, user interface for image manipulation, and display quality. Among the subdimensions, the highest weights were assessed for security, backup, and continuity; tools for continuous performance monitoring; support for multispecialty images; and voice recognition/transcription. PACS administrators' preferences were generally in line with that of previously reported results for radiologists. Both groups assigned the highest priority to ensuring business continuity and preventing loss of data through features such as security, backup, downtime prevention, and tools for continuous PACS performance monitoring. PACS administrators' next high priorities were support for multispecialty images, image retrieval speeds from short-term and long-term storage, real-time monitoring, and architectural issues of compatibility and integration with other products. Thus, next to ensuring business continuity, administrators' focus was on issues that impact their ability to deliver services and support. On the other hand, radiologists gave high priorities to voice recognition, transcription, and reporting; structured reporting; and convenience and responsiveness in manipulation of images. Thus, radiologists' focus appears to be on issues that may impact their productivity, effort, and accuracy.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24744278      PMCID: PMC4090402          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-014-9682-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  25 in total

1.  PACS and multimodality in medical imaging.

Authors:  Y D'Asseler; M Koole; K Van Laere; S Vandenberghe; L Bouwens; R Van de Walle; C Van de Wiele; I Lemahieu; R A Dierckx
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.285

2.  Reinventing radiology in the digital age. Part II. New directions and new stakeholder value.

Authors:  James H Thrall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Automatic image hanging protocol for chest radiographs in PACS.

Authors:  Hui Luo; Wei Hao; David H Foos; Craig W Cornelius
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2006-04

Review 4.  Choosing a radiology workstation: technical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Maria Kallergi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  OpenRIMS: an open architecture radiology informatics management system.

Authors:  Steve Langer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.

Authors:  Jennifer Dykema; Nathan R Jones; Tara Piché; John Stevenson
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Voice recognition--an emerging necessity within radiology: experiences of the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Authors:  A Mehta; K J Dreyer; A Schweitzer; J Couris; D Rosenthal
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Computer-based speech recognition as a replacement for medical transcription.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; F S Chew; D E Dupuy; S V Kattapuram; W E Palmer; R M Yap; L A Levine
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Radiologist assessment of PACS user interface devices.

Authors:  David L Weiss; Khan M Siddiqui; Joe Scopelliti
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Medical imaging informatics: how it improves radiology practice today.

Authors:  J Raymond Geis
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  5 in total

1.  Limitations in and Solutions for Improving the Functionality of Picture Archiving and Communication System: an Exploratory Study of PACS Professionals' Perspectives.

Authors:  Mona Alhajeri; Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Overcoming Challenges for Successful PACS Installation in Low-Resource Regions: Our Experience in Nigeria.

Authors:  Ameena Elahi; Farouk Dako; Jonathan Zember; Bunmi Ojetayo; Dale A Gerus; Alan Schweitzer; Daniel J Mollura; Omer Awan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Users' Perspectives on a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS): An In-Depth Study in a Teaching Hospital in Kuwait.

Authors:  Ali Jassem Buabbas; Dawood Ameer Al-Shamali; Prem Sharma; Salwa Haidar; Hamza Al-Shawaf
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2016-06-15

Review 4.  Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting.

Authors:  Katharina Schmidt; Ines Aumann; Ines Hollander; Kathrin Damm; J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 5.  A review of existing and potential computer user interfaces for modern radiology.

Authors:  Antoine Iannessi; Pierre-Yves Marcy; Olivier Clatz; Anne-Sophie Bertrand; Maki Sugimoto
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.