Literature DB >> 20816631

Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy.

Elizabeth A Krupinski1, Kevin S Berbaum, Robert T Caldwell, Kevin M Schartz, John Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to measure the diagnostic accuracy of fracture detection, visual accommodation, reading time, and subjective ratings of fatigue and visual strain before and after a day of clinical reading.
METHODS: Forty attending radiologists and radiology residents viewed 60 deidentified, HIPAA-compliant bone examinations, half with fractures, once before any clinical reading (early) and once after a day of clinical reading (late). Reading time was recorded. Visual accommodation (the ability to maintain focus) was measured before and after each reading session. Subjective ratings of symptoms of fatigue and oculomotor strain were collected. The study was approved by local institutional review boards.
RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy was reduced significantly after a day of clinical reading, with average areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.885 for early reading and 0.852 for late reading (P < .05). After a day of image interpretation, visual accommodation was no more variable, though error in visual accommodation was greater (P < .01), and subjective ratings of fatigue were higher.
CONCLUSIONS: After a day of clinical reading, radiologists have reduced ability to focus, increased symptoms of fatigue and oculomotor strain, and reduced ability to detect fractures. Radiologists need to be aware of the effects of fatigue on diagnostic accuracy and take steps to mitigate these effects. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20816631      PMCID: PMC2935843          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  29 in total

1.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Prevalence of eye strain among radiologists: influence of viewing variables on symptoms.

Authors:  Talia Vertinsky; Bruce Forster
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The state of teleradiology in 2003 and changes since 1999.

Authors:  Todd L Ebbert; Cristian Meghea; Santiago Iturbe; Howard P Forman; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  On-call radiology: community standards and current trends.

Authors:  Chivonne L Harrigal; William K Erly
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.875

5.  Determinants of radiologists' desired workloads.

Authors:  Cristian Meghea; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.

Authors:  Richard B Ruchman; Joseph Jaeger; Ernest F Wiggins; Syndi Seinfeld; Vikas Thakral; Sudha Bolla; Sara Wallach
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Discrepancy rates of on-call radiology residents' interpretations of CT angiography studies of the neck and circle of Willis.

Authors:  Russell E Meyer; Joshua P Nickerson; Heather N Burbank; Gary F Alsofrom; Grant J Linnell; Christopher G Filippi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Dimensions of fatigue in different working populations.

Authors:  E Ahsberg
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2000-09

9.  Measurement of visual strain in radiologists.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Audit of the change in the on-call practices in neuroradiology and factors affecting it.

Authors:  Nitin Mukerji; Dorothy Wallace; Dipayan Mitra
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  47 in total

1.  Real-time occupational stress and fatigue measurement in medical imaging practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Krupinski; Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Demystifying occupational stress and fatigue through the creation of an adaptive end-user profiling system.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  The insidious problem of fatigue in medical imaging practice.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Innovation strategies for combating occupational stress and fatigue in medical imaging.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Thyroid nodule recognition based on feature selection and pixel classification methods.

Authors:  Dorin Bibicu; Luminita Moraru; Anjan Biswas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Reshaping the emergency radiology call experience after the merger of two programs: the Yale experience.

Authors:  Michael S Kelleher; Michael F Rolen; S A Jamal Bokhari
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-12-29

7.  Image toggling saves time in mammography.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Avi M Aizenman; Matthew B Thompson; Mark D Kovacs; Michael Trambert; Murray A Reicher; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-10-12

8.  Investigating the link between radiologists' gaze, diagnostic decision, and image content.

Authors:  Georgia Tourassi; Sophie Voisin; Vincent Paquit; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Automated Detection, Localization, and Classification of Traumatic Vertebral Body Fractures in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine at CT.

Authors:  Joseph E Burns; Jianhua Yao; Hector Muñoz; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Measuring radiologist workload: how to do it, and why it matters.

Authors:  Adrian P Brady
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.