Literature DB >> 21227412

Endometrial morphology and modulation of hormone receptors during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Laura Detti1, Ghassan M Saed, Nicole M Fletcher, Michael L Kruger, Michelle Brossoit, Michael P Diamond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the biochemical and morphologic implications of different hormonal levels on endometrial development during assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles.
DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study.
SETTING: University center. PATIENT(S): Eleven women during a natural cycle (controls) and 11 oocyte donors during an ART cycle (treated). INTERVENTION(S): At the time consistent with day-3 ET, a transvaginal ultrasound, an endometrial biopsy, and blood sampling were performed. Morphology and thickness of the endometrial stripe were recorded. Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was used to measure messenger RNA (mRNA) levels for estrogen receptor (ER)-α, ER-β, P receptor (PR)-A, and PR-B in the endometrial tissue. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): To evaluate morphologic and biochemical endometrial development. RESULT(S): Endometrium was mostly trilaminar (proliferative-like pattern) and thicker in the treated group, as opposed to homogeneous and thinner in the controls. The PR-B mRNA expression increased 41% in treated patients; PR-A mRNA expression, instead, was unchanged. Serum E(2) and P were higher in the treated group than in controls. In contrast, FSH and LH levels were lower in the treated group. CONCLUSION(S): When compared with natural cycles, exposure of the endometrium to high hormone levels during ovarian stimulation significantly increased PR-B receptor expression at the time of ET. Concurrently, a proliferative-like endometrial pattern persisted. These findings reflect a delayed endometrial development in ART.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21227412      PMCID: PMC3769103          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

1.  Gene expression profiles and structural/functional features of the peri-implantation endometrium in natural and gonadotropin-stimulated cycles.

Authors:  Sebastian Mirkin; George Nikas; Jeng-Gwang Hsiu; José Díaz; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 2.  The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review.

Authors:  S Friedler; J G Schenker; A Herman; A Lewin
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF)

Authors:  Y Gonen; R F Casper
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1990-06

4.  Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up.

Authors:  Efstratios Kolibianakis; Claire Bourgain; Carola Albano; Kaan Osmanagaoglu; Johan Smitz; Andre Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Endometrial pattern on the day of oocyte retrieval is more predictive of implantation success than the pattern or thickness on the day of hCG administration.

Authors:  F I Sharara; J Lim; H D McClamrock
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status.

Authors:  Christos Coutifaris; Evan R Myers; David S Guzick; Michael P Diamond; Sandra A Carson; Richard S Legro; Peter G McGovern; William D Schlaff; Bruce R Carr; Michael P Steinkampf; Susan Silva; Donna L Vogel; Phyllis C Leppert
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  The opposing transcriptional activities of the two isoforms of the human progesterone receptor are due to differential cofactor binding.

Authors:  P H Giangrande; E A Kimbrel; D P Edwards; D P McDonnell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Advanced endometrial maturation after ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotropin/human chorionic gonadotropin for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  J E Garcia; A A Acosta; J G Hsiu; H W Jones
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptor alpha, estrogen receptor beta and progesterone receptor in normal human endometrium.

Authors:  Ioannis Mylonas; Udo Jeschke; Naim Shabani; Christina Kuhn; Angelika Balle; Silke Kriegel; M S Markus S Kupka; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Acta Histochem       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.479

10.  Ultrastructural characteristics of the luteal phase endometrium in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  B A Kolb; S Najmabadi; R J Paulson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  3 in total

1.  Endometrial signaling pathways during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction technology.

Authors:  Laura Detti; Rebecca A Uhlmann; Nicole M Fletcher; Michael P Diamond; Ghassan M Saed
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Efficacy of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Alone, FSH + Luteinizing Hormone, Human Menopausal Gonadotropin or FSH + Human Chorionic Gonadotropin on Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in the "Personalized" Medicine Era: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Santi; Livio Casarini; Carlo Alviggi; Manuela Simoni
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  The effect of endometrial thickness and pattern measured by ultrasonography on pregnancy outcomes during IVF-ET cycles.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Qiong Zhang; Yanping Li
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.211

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.