Literature DB >> 11008145

Amblyopic deficits in detecting a dotted line in noise.

A J Mussap1, D M Levi.   

Abstract

We compared detectability of a dotted line masked by random-dot noise for the amblyopic versus non-amblyopic eye of two strabismic amblyopes. Small but consistent deficits in the amblyopic eye of these observers were found, and shown to be limited to dotted-line targets composed of greater than seven dots (with performance being normal for targets of less than seven dots). These deficits were unrelated to impaired visual acuity, impaired sensitivity to dot density, and differential positional uncertainty between the eyes of our observers. The deficits were also unlikely to be due to CSF losses due to abnormal low-spatial-frequency filters involved in detecting long chains of collinear dots. Instead, the results of simulations indicate that the inefficiency in utilising large numbers of dots is due to deficits of global, integrative processes in strabismic amblyopes. These simulations also show that while neither undersampling nor positional uncertainty of inputs into integrative processes can themselves account for the amblyopic deficits, if such abnormal inputs lead to the development of stunted integrative processes then impaired sensitivity to long chains of collinear dots is indeed predicted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11008145     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00154-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Global contour processing in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Cong Yu; Shu-Guang Kuai; Elizabeth Rislove
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Early monocular defocus disrupts the normal development of receptive-field structure in V2 neurons of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Tao; Bin Zhang; Guofu Shen; Janice Wensveen; Earl L Smith; Shinji Nishimoto; Izumi Ohzawa; Yuzo M Chino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Attention deficits in Amblyopia.

Authors:  Preeti Verghese; Suzanne P McKee; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-03-22

5.  Noisy Spiking in Visual Area V2 of Amblyopic Monkeys.

Authors:  Ye Wang; Bin Zhang; Xiaofeng Tao; Janice M Wensveen; Earl L Smith; Yuzo M Chino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Image segregation in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Global processing in amblyopia: a review.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Joanna Black; Shuan Dai; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-17

8.  Processing deficits of motion of contrast-modulated gratings in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Yong Tang; Caiyuan Liu; Zhongjian Liu; Xiaopeng Hu; Yong-Qiang Yu; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.