Literature DB >> 10927117

Detecting disorder in spatial vision.

D M Levi1, S A Klein, V Sharma, L Nguyen.   

Abstract

In normal foveal vision, visual space is accurately mapped from retina to cortex. However, the normal periphery, and the central field of strabismic amblyopes have elevated position discrimination thresholds, which have often been ascribed to increased 'intrinsic' spatial disorder. In the present study we evaluated the sensitivity of the human visual system (both normal and amblyopic) to spatial disorder, and asked whether there is increased 'intrinsic' topographical disorder in the amblyopic visual system. Specifically, we measured thresholds for detecting disorder (two-dimensional Gaussian position perturbations) either in a horizontal string of N equally spaced samples (Gabor patches), or in a ring of equally spaced samples over a wide range of feature separations. We also estimated both the 'equivalent intrinsic spatial disorder' and sampling efficiency using an equivalent noise approach. Our results suggest that both thresholds for detecting disorder, and equivalent intrinsic disorder depend strongly on separation, and are modestly increased in strabismic amblyopes. Strabismic amblyopes also show markedly reduced sampling efficiency. However, neither amblyopic nor peripheral vision performs like ideal or human observers with added separation-independent positional noise. Rather, the strong separation dependence suggests that the 'equivalent intrinsic disorder' may not reflect topographic disorder at all, but rather may reflect an abnormality in the amblyopes' Weber relationship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10927117     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00087-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

1.  Global contour processing in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Cong Yu; Shu-Guang Kuai; Elizabeth Rislove
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Disruption of Positional Encoding at Small Separations in the Amblyopic Periphery.

Authors:  Zahra Hussain; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.925

4.  Psychophysical evidence for a non-linear representation of facial identity.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Diana Omigie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 1.886

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.