P Furness1. 1. University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK. peter.furness@leicester.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of internet-based virtual microscopy with conventional light microscopy, in the context of renal biopsies assessed by participants in the UK National Renal Pathology External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme. METHODS AND RESULTS: 'Virtual slides' of current EQA cases were made available over the internet to participants in the scheme. The approach permitted what may reasonably be described as a randomized controlled trial of the diagnostic accuracy of this mode of telepathology, in the context of renal pathology. No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy could be detected between the diagnoses proffered on the basis of virtual slides and conventional slides; but using virtual slides took pathologists considerably longer. CONCLUSIONS: This result provides some encouragement for the implementation of such virtual slide-based telepathology systems. However, in failing to detect a difference, equivalence of diagnostic accuracy has not been proved; nor has the relevance of this result to other fields of histopathology been demonstrated. A decision to implement a diagnostic telepathology system requires consideration of numerous factors beyond diagnostic accuracy, including financial, legal, professional and ethical issues.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of internet-based virtual microscopy with conventional light microscopy, in the context of renal biopsies assessed by participants in the UK National Renal Pathology External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme. METHODS AND RESULTS: 'Virtual slides' of current EQA cases were made available over the internet to participants in the scheme. The approach permitted what may reasonably be described as a randomized controlled trial of the diagnostic accuracy of this mode of telepathology, in the context of renal pathology. No significant difference in diagnostic accuracy could be detected between the diagnoses proffered on the basis of virtual slides and conventional slides; but using virtual slides took pathologists considerably longer. CONCLUSIONS: This result provides some encouragement for the implementation of such virtual slide-based telepathology systems. However, in failing to detect a difference, equivalence of diagnostic accuracy has not been proved; nor has the relevance of this result to other fields of histopathology been demonstrated. A decision to implement a diagnostic telepathology system requires consideration of numerous factors beyond diagnostic accuracy, including financial, legal, professional and ethical issues.
Authors: Cynthia C Nast; Kevin V Lemley; Jeffrey B Hodgin; Serena Bagnasco; Carmen Avila-Casado; Stephen M Hewitt; Laura Barisoni Journal: Semin Nephrol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 5.299
Authors: Mikael Lundin; Janusz Szymas; Ewert Linder; Hans Beck; Peter de Wilde; Han van Krieken; Marcial García Rojo; Ignacio Moreno; Aurelio Ariza; Sitki Tuzlali; Sergülen Dervişoğlu; Heikki Helin; Veli-Pekka Lehto; Johan Lundin Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2009-03-12 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Devon S Chabot-Richards; David R Martin; Orrin B Myers; David R Czuchlewski; Kristin E Hunt Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Jarcy Zee; Jeffrey B Hodgin; Laura H Mariani; Joseph P Gaut; Matthew B Palmer; Serena M Bagnasco; Avi Z Rosenberg; Stephen M Hewitt; Lawrence B Holzman; Brenda W Gillespie; Laura Barisoni Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Liron Pantanowitz; John H Sinard; Walter H Henricks; Lisa A Fatheree; Alexis B Carter; Lydia Contis; Bruce A Beckwith; Andrew J Evans; Avtar Lal; Anil V Parwani Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 5.534