Literature DB >> 10773727

Prospective assessment of the clinical value of anorectal investigations.

C J Vaizey1, M A Kamm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Anorectal physiological testing and imaging have become part of routine colorectal and gastro-enterological practice, but their clinical value is controversial. We prospectively evaluated the new diagnostic information, impact on management and prognostic information provided by anorectal testing.
METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients referred for testing were studied. The referring doctor's diagnosis, reason for referral, planned management and expectation of the value of investigations were recorded. Incontinent patients underwent anorectal physiological testing and endo-anal ultrasound. Patients with constipation underwent anorectal physiological testing and a study of whole-gut transit time to distinguish between slow and normal transit. Constipated patients over age 45, or those younger patients who digitated to assist defaecation, also underwent evacuation proctography to identify large rectoceles.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients had faecal incontinence. Of 12 patients with suspected anterior external anal sphincter obstetric damage, all of whom were planned for surgical repair, 3 were unsuitable for repair, 3 had a normal sphincter, 2 had a weak but structurally intact sphincter, and 1 had internal anal sphincter damage only. Of 6 patients with failed anterior repair, 3 had a defect suitable for repeat repair, 2 had intact repairs and good function, and 1 had extensive damage requiring reconstructive surgery. The tests also influenced management for incontinent patients after haemorrhoidectomy surgery (n = 5), after fistula surgery (n = 5), with congenital abnormalities (n = 3), after cerebrovascular accident (n = 1) and those with no presumptive diagnosis (n = 15). Of the 20 patients referred with constipation, demonstration of a recto-anal reflex in 1 patient with a megarectum excluded the need for full-thickness biopsy. A further patient with altered electrosensation went on to have a neurological lesion defined. Definition of slow transit in some patients did not immediately affect management. New information or a change in management was provided in patients referred for pre-operative assessment (n = 13). Information was gained in only 1 of 7 patients with solitary rectal ulcer and in none of the 8 patients with anal pain.
CONCLUSION: Anorectal assessment provides important diagnostic and prognostic information and directly alters management in patients with benign anorectal disorders. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10773727     DOI: 10.1159/000007759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digestion        ISSN: 0012-2823            Impact factor:   3.216


  10 in total

1.  Translabial ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincter complex: normal measurements of the internal and external anal sphincters at the proximal, mid-, and distal levels.

Authors:  Rebecca J Hall; Rebecca G Rogers; Lori Saiz; C Qualls
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-01-13

2.  Relationships between the results of anorectal investigations and symptom severity in patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  P T Heitmann; P Rabbitt; A Schloithe; V Patton; P P Skuza; D A Wattchow; P G Dinning
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Factor analysis identifies subgroups of constipation.

Authors:  Philip G Dinning; Mike Jones; Linda Hunt; Sergio E Fuentealba; Jamshid Kalanter; Denis W King; David Z Lubowski; Nicholas J Talley; Ian J Cook
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Discriminative value of anorectal manometry in clinical practice.

Authors:  Naeem Raza; Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Anterior anal sphincter repair: results in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Colin Elton; Brian J Stoodley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function.

Authors:  Emma V Carrington; S Mark Scott; Adil Bharucha; François Mion; Jose M Remes-Troche; Allison Malcolm; Henriette Heinrich; Mark Fox; Satish S Rao
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 7.  Diagnostic testing in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Anjana Kumar; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-10

8.  Referral for anorectal function evaluation is indicated in 65% and beneficial in 92% of patients.

Authors:  Maria M Szojda; Erik Tanis; Chris J J Mulder; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Feasibility of a second-generation colon capsule in visualization of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Gangping Li; Yu Jin; Tao Bai; Wei Qian; Xiaoping Xie; Xiaohua Hou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03

Review 10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of anal motor and rectal sensory dysfunction in male and female patients undergoing anorectal manometry for symptoms of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Annika M P Rasijeff; Karla García-Zermeño; Gian-Luca Di Tanna; José Remes-Troche; Charles H Knowles; Mark S Scott
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.