Literature DB >> 17218456

Classical versus stochastic kinetics modeling of biochemical reaction systems.

John Goutsias1.   

Abstract

We study fundamental relationships between classical and stochastic chemical kinetics for general biochemical systems with elementary reactions. Analytical and numerical investigations show that intrinsic fluctuations may qualitatively and quantitatively affect both transient and stationary system behavior. Thus, we provide a theoretical understanding of the role that intrinsic fluctuations may play in inducing biochemical function. The mean concentration dynamics are governed by differential equations that are similar to the ones of classical chemical kinetics, expressed in terms of the stoichiometry matrix and time-dependent fluxes. However, each flux is decomposed into a macroscopic term, which accounts for the effect of mean reactant concentrations on the rate of product synthesis, and a mesoscopic term, which accounts for the effect of statistical correlations among interacting reactions. We demonstrate that the ability of a model to account for phenomena induced by intrinsic fluctuations may be seriously compromised if we do not include the mesoscopic fluxes. Unfortunately, computation of fluxes and mean concentration dynamics requires intensive Monte Carlo simulation. To circumvent the computational expense, we employ a moment closure scheme, which leads to differential equations that can be solved by standard numerical techniques to obtain more accurate approximations of fluxes and mean concentration dynamics than the ones obtained with the classical approach.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17218456      PMCID: PMC1864832          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.093781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  21 in total

Review 1.  Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays.

Authors:  D J Lockhart; E A Winzeler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression.

Authors:  William J Blake; Mads KAErn; Charles R Cantor; J J Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise.

Authors:  Christopher V Rao; Denise M Wolf; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Fluctuations in transcription factor binding can explain the graded and binary responses observed in inducible gene expression.

Authors:  Jason R Pirone; Timothy C Elston
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Fast evaluation of fluctuations in biochemical networks with the linear noise approximation.

Authors:  Johan Elf; Måns Ehrenberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Tracking operator state fluctuations in gene expression in single cells.

Authors:  B Banerjee; S Balasubramanian; G Ananthakrishna; T V Ramakrishnan; G V Shivashankar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ertugrul M Ozbudak; Mukund Thattai; Han N Lim; Boris I Shraiman; Alexander Van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Imaging gene expression in single living cells.

Authors:  Yaron Shav-Tal; Robert H Singer; Xavier Darzacq
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Quantification of multiple gene expression in individual cells.

Authors:  António Peixoto; Marta Monteiro; Benedita Rocha; Henrique Veiga-Fernandes
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  A hidden Markov model for transcriptional regulation in single cells.

Authors:  John Goutsias
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  20 in total

1.  Fluctuations and the rate-limiting step of peptide-induced membrane leakage.

Authors:  C Mazzuca; B Orioni; M Coletta; F Formaggio; C Toniolo; G Maulucci; M De Spirito; B Pispisa; M Venanzi; L Stella
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Stochastic simulation of enzyme-catalyzed reactions with disparate timescales.

Authors:  Debashis Barik; Mark R Paul; William T Baumann; Yang Cao; John J Tyson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Enhanced identification and exploitation of time scales for model reduction in stochastic chemical kinetics.

Authors:  Carlos A Gómez-Uribe; George C Verghese; Abraham R Tzafriri
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  The effects of reversibility and noise on stochastic phosphorylation cycles and cascades.

Authors:  Clark A Miller; Daniel A Beard
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Validation of fractal-like kinetic models by time-resolved binding kinetics of dansylamide and carbonic anhydrase in crowded media.

Authors:  Kevin L Neff; Chetan P Offord; Ariel J Caride; Emanuel E Strehler; Franklyn G Prendergast; Zeljko Bajzer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  An efficient and unbiased method for sensitivity analysis of stochastic reaction networks.

Authors:  Ankit Gupta; Mustafa Khammash
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Analytical Derivation of Moment Equations in Stochastic Chemical Kinetics.

Authors:  Vassilios Sotiropoulos; Yiannis N Kaznessis
Journal:  Chem Eng Sci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.311

8.  Temperature control of fimbriation circuit switch in uropathogenic Escherichia coli: quantitative analysis via automated model abstraction.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kuwahara; Chris J Myers; Michael S Samoilov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Computational Cellular Dynamics Based on the Chemical Master Equation: A Challenge for Understanding Complexity.

Authors:  Jie Liang; Hong Qian
Journal:  J Comput Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.571

10.  Efficient calculation of steady state probability distribution for stochastic biochemical reaction network.

Authors:  Shahriar Karim; Gregery T Buzzard; David M Umulis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.