Literature DB >> 25354975

An efficient and unbiased method for sensitivity analysis of stochastic reaction networks.

Ankit Gupta1, Mustafa Khammash2.   

Abstract

We consider the problem of estimating parameter sensitivity for Markovian models of reaction networks. Sensitivity values measure the responsiveness of an output with respect to the model parameters. They help in analysing the network, understanding its robustness properties and identifying the important reactions for a specific output. Sensitivity values are commonly estimated using methods that perform finite-difference computations along with Monte Carlo simulations of the reaction dynamics. These methods are computationally efficient and easy to implement, but they produce a biased estimate which can be unreliable for certain applications. Moreover, the size of the bias is generally unknown and hence the accuracy of these methods cannot be easily determined. There also exist unbiased schemes for sensitivity estimation but these schemes can be computationally infeasible, even for very simple networks. Our goal in this paper is to present a new method for sensitivity estimation, which combines the computational efficiency of finite-difference methods with the accuracy of unbiased schemes. Our method is easy to implement and it relies on an exact representation of parameter sensitivity that we recently proved elsewhere. Through examples, we demonstrate that the proposed method can outperform the existing methods, both biased and unbiased, in many situations.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Markov process; parameter sensitivity; stochastic reaction networks; unbiased estimator

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25354975      PMCID: PMC4223925          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  15 in total

1.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  T S Gardner; C R Cantor; J J Collins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Mechanisms of noise-resistance in genetic oscillators.

Authors:  José M G Vilar; Hao Yuan Kueh; Naama Barkai; Stanislas Leibler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Stochastic gene expression in a single cell.

Authors:  Michael B Elowitz; Arnold J Levine; Eric D Siggia; Peter S Swain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Robustness properties of circadian clock architectures.

Authors:  Jörg Stelling; Ernst Dieter Gilles; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sensitivity analysis of discrete stochastic systems.

Authors:  Rudiyanto Gunawan; Yang Cao; Linda Petzold; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Efficient step size selection for the tau-leaping simulation method.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Daniel T Gillespie; Linda R Petzold
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Efficient computation of parameter sensitivities of discrete stochastic chemical reaction networks.

Authors:  Muruhan Rathinam; Patrick W Sheppard; Mustafa Khammash
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Network analyses in systems pharmacology.

Authors:  Seth I Berger; Ravi Iyengar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression.

Authors:  H H McAdams; A Arkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Hybrid pathwise sensitivity methods for discrete stochastic models of chemical reaction systems.

Authors:  Elizabeth Skubak Wolf; David F Anderson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  How to deal with parameters for whole-cell modelling.

Authors:  Ann C Babtie; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  DeepCME: A deep learning framework for computing solution statistics of the chemical master equation.

Authors:  Ankit Gupta; Christoph Schwab; Mustafa Khammash
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.