OBJECTIVE: Irreversible electroporation is a nonthermal ablative tool that uses direct electrical pulses to create irreversible membrane pores and cell death. The ablation zone is surrounded by a zone of reversibly increased permeability; either zone can cause cardiac arrhythmias. Our purpose was to establish a safety profile for the use of irreversible electroporation close to the heart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effect of unsynchronized and synchronized (with the R wave on ECG) irreversible electroporation in swine lung and myocardium was studied in 11 pigs. Twelve lead ECG recordings were analyzed by an electrophysiologist for the presence of arrhythmia. Ventricular arrhythmias were categorized as major events. Minor events included all other dysrhythmias or ECG changes. Cardiac and lung tissue was submitted for histopathologic analysis. Electrical field modeling was performed to predict the distance from the applicators over which cells show electroporation-induced increased permeability. RESULTS: At less than or equal to 1.7 cm from the heart, fatal (major) events occurred with all unsynchronized irreversible electroporation. No major and three minor events were seen with synchronized irreversible electroporation. At more than 1.7 cm from the heart, two minor events occurred with only unsynchronized irreversible electroporation. Electrical field modeling correlates well with the clinical results, revealing increased cell membrane permeability up to 1.7 cm away from the applicators. Complete lung ablation without intervening live cells was seen. No myocardial injury was seen. CONCLUSION: Unsynchronized irreversible electroporation close to the heart can cause fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Synchronizing irreversible electroporation pulse delivery with absolute refractory period avoids significant cardiac arrhythmias.
OBJECTIVE: Irreversible electroporation is a nonthermal ablative tool that uses direct electrical pulses to create irreversible membrane pores and cell death. The ablation zone is surrounded by a zone of reversibly increased permeability; either zone can cause cardiac arrhythmias. Our purpose was to establish a safety profile for the use of irreversible electroporation close to the heart. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effect of unsynchronized and synchronized (with the R wave on ECG) irreversible electroporation in swine lung and myocardium was studied in 11 pigs. Twelve lead ECG recordings were analyzed by an electrophysiologist for the presence of arrhythmia. Ventricular arrhythmias were categorized as major events. Minor events included all other dysrhythmias or ECG changes. Cardiac and lung tissue was submitted for histopathologic analysis. Electrical field modeling was performed to predict the distance from the applicators over which cells show electroporation-induced increased permeability. RESULTS: At less than or equal to 1.7 cm from the heart, fatal (major) events occurred with all unsynchronized irreversible electroporation. No major and three minor events were seen with synchronized irreversible electroporation. At more than 1.7 cm from the heart, two minor events occurred with only unsynchronized irreversible electroporation. Electrical field modeling correlates well with the clinical results, revealing increased cell membrane permeability up to 1.7 cm away from the applicators. Complete lung ablation without intervening live cells was seen. No myocardial injury was seen. CONCLUSION: Unsynchronized irreversible electroporation close to the heart can cause fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Synchronizing irreversible electroporation pulse delivery with absolute refractory period avoids significant cardiac arrhythmias.
Authors: W Jungraithmayr; M Szarzynski; H Neeff; J Haberstroh; G Kirste; A Schmitt-Graeff; E H Farthmann; S Eggstein Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Stefan Fritz; Christof M Sommer; Thomas Longerich; Clemens Kuhn-Neureuther; Boris Radeleff; Jens Werner; Thilo Hackert Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: George A Carberry; Elisabetta Nocerino; Peter J Mason; Denise J Schwahn; Scott Hetzel; Alyssa M Turnquist; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Alexander Golberg; Martin Villiger; G Felix Broelsch; Kyle P Quinn; Hassan Albadawi; Saiqa Khan; Michael T Watkins; Irene Georgakoudi; William G Austen; Marianna Bei; Brett E Bouma; Martin C Mihm; Martin L Yarmush Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 3.963
Authors: Christoph Niessen; Ernst Michael Jung; Walter A Wohlgemuth; Benedikt Trabold; Michael Haimerl; Andreas Schreyer; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Francesco Bellissimo; Marilia Rita Pinzone; Bruno Cacopardo; Giuseppe Nunnari Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 5.742