Literature DB >> 17209726

A cortical pooling model of spatial summation for perimetric stimuli.

Fei Pan1, William H Swanson.   

Abstract

Contemporary models of perimetric sensitivity assume probability summation of retinal ganglion cell sensitivities, ignoring cortical processing. To assess the role of cortical processing in perimetric spatial summation, we used a common form of multiple-mechanism spatial vision model in which the stimulus is sampled by receptive fields analogous to those of simple cells in primary visual cortex. Psychophysical threshold was computed by probability summation across the receptive fields. When the receptive fields were nonoriented (like ganglion cells), the spatial summation function had a large nonmonotonic transitional region that was inconsistent with perimetric spatial summation data. When the receptive fields were orientation tuned (like cortical cells), the model was able to give good fits to perimetric spatial summation data. The predictions of the model were evaluated with a masking study, in which noise masks either enlarged the critical area or changed the shape of the spatial summation functions. We conclude that cortical pooling by multiple spatial mechanisms can account for perimetric spatial summation, whereas probability summation across ganglion cells cannot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17209726      PMCID: PMC3777700          DOI: 10.1167/6.11.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  32 in total

1.  Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm.

Authors:  V C Smith; J Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection.

Authors:  R F Quick
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1974

3.  Studies of spatial summation of central retinal areas in normal people of all ages.

Authors:  F Dannheim; S M Drance
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  Invariant features of spatial summation with changing locus in the visual field.

Authors:  M E Wilson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Contrast masking in human vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J M Foley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1980-12

6.  Spatiotemporal variation of chromatic and achromatic contrast thresholds.

Authors:  D H Kelly
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1983-06

7.  Effects of target size and eccentricity on visual detection and resolution.

Authors:  C A Johnson; J L Keltner; F Balestrery
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Retinal sensitivity and spatial summation in the foveal and parafoveal regions.

Authors:  T Inui; O Mimura; K Kani
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1981-02

9.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field.

Authors:  J G Robson; N Graham
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The receptive fields of the retina.

Authors:  V D Glezer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  26 in total

1.  Estimation of spatial scale across the visual field using sinusoidal stimuli.

Authors:  Kelsey M Keltgen; William H Swanson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Hao Sun; Barry B Lee; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Assessment of contrast gain signature in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Hao Sun; William H Swanson; Brian Arvidson; Mitchell W Dul
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Differences in the Relation Between Perimetric Sensitivity and Variability Between Locations Across the Visual Field.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Longitudinal Macular Structure-Function Relationships in Glaucoma and Their Sources of Variability.

Authors:  Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Nima Fatehi; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 6.  'Structure-function relationship' in glaucoma: past thinking and current concepts.

Authors:  Rizwan Malik; William H Swanson; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Ying Wang; Joanne Wu; Stanley P Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Individual differences in the shape of the nasal visual field.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul; Douglas G Horner; Victor E Malinovsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A two-stage neural spiking model of visual contrast detection in perimetry.

Authors:  S K Gardiner; W H Swanson; S Demirel; A M McKendrick; A Turpin; C A Johnson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Spatial summation in the human fovea: Do normal optical aberrations and fixational eye movements have an effect?

Authors:  William S Tuten; Robert F Cooper; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Alfredo Dubra; Austin Roorda; Nicolas P Cottaris; David H Brainard; Jessica I W Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.