Literature DB >> 5499738

Invariant features of spatial summation with changing locus in the visual field.

M E Wilson.   

Abstract

1. Spatial summation curves have been determined under photopic conditions for loci between 5 and 55 degrees from fixation. At each locus the area and Weber fraction for the largest stimulus showing complete summation (Sc) has been estimated. While the area of Sc increases progressively towards the periphery, its Weber fraction remains constant.2. The invariance of the Weber fraction for Sc, coupled with changes in its area, have been compared with similar findings observed during changes in adaptation level, in impaired fields, and during accommodative and convergence changes. It is suggested that the Weber fraction for Sc may be an important parameter of visual function which is maintained under changing conditions by alterations in the area over which background energy is summated.3. It has been shown that, for stimulus areas up to at least 1 log unit greater than Sc, all the summation curves from 5 to 55 degrees from fixation can be superimposed by simple displacement along the log area axis. For loci closer together, the superimposition has been shown for larger ranges of areas beyond Sc. This suggests that, so far as spatial summation is concerned, changes in locus serve only to change the spatial scale of the visual system.4. Comparisons have been made between the area of Sc at various loci and the sizes of the central regions of the receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells determined electrophysiologically in the primate.

Mesh:

Year:  1970        PMID: 5499738      PMCID: PMC1348730          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  8 in total

1.  Scotopic acuity and absolute threshold in brief flashes.

Authors:  P E HALLETT
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Receptive fields of optic nerve fibres in the spider monkey.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1960-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations.

Authors:  H B BARLOW
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-05-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation.

Authors:  H B BARLOW; R FITZHUGH; S W KUFFLER
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities.

Authors:  H B BARLOW
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1958-04-30       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  [Examination of spatial summation with static and kinetic stimuli marks by the method of quantitative light perception perimetry].

Authors:  F FANKHAUSER; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1958 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  The receptive fields of the retina.

Authors:  V D Glezer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Spatial and temporal summation in impaired regions of the visual field.

Authors:  M E Wilson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-04       Impact factor: 5.182

  8 in total
  30 in total

1.  Spatial summation in human cone mechanisms from 0 degrees to 20 degrees in the superior retina.

Authors:  V J Volbrecht; E E Shrago; B E Schefrin; J S Werner
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Senescent changes in photopic spatial summation.

Authors:  Maka Malania; Frédéric Devinck; Kenneth Knoblauch; Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Disclosing disease mechanisms with a spatio-temporal summation paradigm.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Rebecca K O'Loughlin; Robyn H Guymer; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  A cortical pooling model of spatial summation for perimetric stimuli.

Authors:  Fei Pan; William H Swanson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Eccentricity-dependent residual target detection in visual field defects.

Authors:  P Stoerig; E Pöppel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor.

Authors:  V Virsu; J Rovamo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual detection of spatial contrast; influence of location in the visual field, target extent and illuminance level.

Authors:  J J Koenderink; A J van Doorn
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1978-09-21       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Distance estimation is influenced by encoding conditions.

Authors:  Anna Oleksiak; Mirosława Mańko; Albert Postma; Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert V van den Berg; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The mechanisms of vision loss associated with a cotton wool spot.

Authors:  Toco Y P Chui; Larry N Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Mapping the perceptual grain of the human retina.

Authors:  Wolf M Harmening; William S Tuten; Austin Roorda; Lawrence C Sincich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.