Literature DB >> 18602414

A two-stage neural spiking model of visual contrast detection in perimetry.

S K Gardiner1, W H Swanson, S Demirel, A M McKendrick, A Turpin, C A Johnson.   

Abstract

Perimetry is a commonly used clinical test for visual function, limited by high variability. The sources of this variability need to be better understood. In this paper, we investigate whether noise intrinsic to neural firing could explain the variability in normal subjects. We present the most physiologically accurate model to date for stimulus detection in perimetry combining knowledge of the physiology of components of the visual system with signal detection theory, and show that it requires that detection be mediated by multiple cortical cells in order to give predictions consistent with psychometric functions measured in human observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18602414      PMCID: PMC2553713          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  49 in total

1.  Correlated firing in macaque visual area MT: time scales and relationship to behavior.

Authors:  W Bair; E Zohary; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Variability of visual field measurements is correlated with the gradient of visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Harry J Wyatt; Mitchell W Dul; William H Swanson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Eye Movements During Perimetry and the Effect that Fixational Instability Has on Perimetric Outcomes.

Authors:  S Demirel; A J Vingrys
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Noise adaptation in integrate-and fire neurons.

Authors:  M E Rudd; L G Brown
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; J D Tompkins; R P LeBlanc; T A McCormick
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Linear signal transmission from prepotentials to cells in the macaque lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  B B Lee; V Virsu; O D Creutzfeldt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons.

Authors:  L A Kerrigan-Baumrind; H A Quigley; M E Pease; D F Kerrigan; R S Mitchell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Quantitative estimations of foveal and extra-foveal retinal circuitry in humans.

Authors:  J Sjöstrand; V Olsson; Z Popovic; N Conradi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data.

Authors:  P G Spry; A B Bates; C A Johnson; B C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; J A Movshon; A F Dean
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  10 in total

1.  Differences in the Relation Between Perimetric Sensitivity and Variability Between Locations Across the Visual Field.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  'Structure-function relationship' in glaucoma: past thinking and current concepts.

Authors:  Rizwan Malik; William H Swanson; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  The effect of test variability on the structure-function relationship in early glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Chris A Johnson; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Individual differences in the shape of the nasal visual field.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul; Douglas G Horner; Victor E Malinovsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; William H Swanson; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Choice of Stimulus Range and Size Can Reduce Test-Retest Variability in Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Douglas G Horner; Mitchell W Dul; Victor E Malinovsky
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Contrast sensitivity perimetry and clinical measures of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Victor E Malinovsky; Mitchell W Dul; Rizwan Malik; Julie K Torbit; Bradley M Sutton; Douglas G Horner
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Long- and Short-Term Variability of Perimetry in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; William H Swanson; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.048

9.  Moving Stimulus Perimetry: A New Functional Test for Glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.048

10.  The Effect of Limiting the Range of Perimetric Sensitivities on Pointwise Assessment of Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; William H Swanson; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.