Literature DB >> 17203985

Prediction of missed cleavage sites in tryptic peptides aids protein identification in proteomics.

Jennifer A Siepen1, Emma-Jayne Keevil, David Knight, Simon J Hubbard.   

Abstract

Protein identification via peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) remains a key component of high-throughput proteomics experiments in post-genomic science. Candidate protein identifications are made using bioinformatic tools from peptide peak lists obtained via mass spectrometry (MS). These algorithms rely on several search parameters, including the number of potential uncut peptide bonds matching the primary specificity of the hydrolytic enzyme used in the experiment. Typically, up to one of these "missed cleavages" are considered by the bioinformatics search tools, usually after digestion of the in silico proteome by trypsin. Using two distinct, nonredundant datasets of peptides identified via PMF and tandem MS, a simple predictive method based on information theory is presented which is able to identify experimentally defined missed cleavages with up to 90% accuracy from amino acid sequence alone. Using this simple protocol, we are able to "mask" candidate protein databases so that confident missed cleavage sites need not be considered for in silico digestion. We show that that this leads to an improvement in database searching, with two different search engines, using the PMF dataset as a test set. In addition, the improved approach is also demonstrated on an independent PMF data set of known proteins that also has corresponding high-quality tandem MS data, validating the protein identifications. This approach has wider applicability for proteomics database searching, and the program for predicting missed cleavages and masking Fasta-formatted protein sequence databases has been made available via http:// ispider.smith.man.ac uk/MissedCleave.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17203985      PMCID: PMC2664920          DOI: 10.1021/pr060507u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  16 in total

1.  FindPept, a tool to identify unmatched masses in peptide mass fingerprinting protein identification.

Authors:  Alexandre Gattiker; Willy V Bienvenut; Amos Bairoch; Elisabeth Gasteiger
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme.

Authors:  B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-10-20

3.  Modular, scriptable and automated analysis tools for high-throughput peptide mass fingerprinting.

Authors:  Jim Samuelsson; Daniel Dalevi; Fredrik Levander; Thorsteinn Rögnvaldsson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Rapid identification of proteins by peptide-mass fingerprinting.

Authors:  D J Pappin; P Hojrup; A J Bleasby
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery.

Authors:  Anne-Claude Gavin; Patrick Aloy; Paola Grandi; Roland Krause; Markus Boesche; Martina Marzioch; Christina Rau; Lars Juhl Jensen; Sonja Bastuck; Birgit Dümpelfeld; Angela Edelmann; Marie-Anne Heurtier; Verena Hoffman; Christian Hoefert; Karin Klein; Manuela Hudak; Anne-Marie Michon; Malgorzata Schelder; Markus Schirle; Marita Remor; Tatjana Rudi; Sean Hooper; Andreas Bauer; Tewis Bouwmeester; Georg Casari; Gerard Drewes; Gitte Neubauer; Jens M Rick; Bernhard Kuster; Peer Bork; Robert B Russell; Giulio Superti-Furga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Optimizing search conditions for the mass fingerprint-based identification of proteins.

Authors:  Elena Ossipova; David Fenyö; Jan Eriksson
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain.

Authors:  I Schechter; A Berger
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1967-04-20       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Improving sensitivity in shotgun proteomics using a peptide-centric database with reduced complexity: protease cleavage and SCX elution rules from data mining of MS/MS spectra.

Authors:  Chia-Yu Yen; Steve Russell; Alex M Mendoza; Karen Meyer-Arendt; Shaojun Sun; Krzysztof J Cios; Natalie G Ahn; Katheryn A Resing
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Trypsin cleaves exclusively C-terminal to arginine and lysine residues.

Authors:  Jesper V Olsen; Shao-En Ong; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Universal metrics for quality assessment of protein identifications by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  David A Stead; Alun Preece; Alistair J P Brown
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  35 in total

1.  Simultaneous phenotyping and quantification of α-1-antitrypsin by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yuhong Chen; Melissa R Snyder; Yi Zhu; Linda J Tostrud; Linda M Benson; Jerry A Katzmann; H Robert Bergen
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Absolute quantification of the glycolytic pathway in yeast: deployment of a complete QconCAT approach.

Authors:  Kathleen M Carroll; Deborah M Simpson; Claire E Eyers; Christopher G Knight; Philip Brownridge; Warwick B Dunn; Catherine L Winder; Karin Lanthaler; Pinar Pir; Naglis Malys; Douglas B Kell; Stephen G Oliver; Simon J Gaskell; Robert J Beynon
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Feature-matching pattern-based support vector machines for robust peptide mass fingerprinting.

Authors:  Youyuan Li; Pei Hao; Siliang Zhang; Yixue Li
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Development of an antibody-free ID-LC MS method for the quantification of procalcitonin in human serum at sub-microgram per liter level using a peptide-based calibration.

Authors:  Huu-Hien Huynh; Amandine Bœuf; Maxence Derbez-Morin; Anne-Marie Dupuy; Béatrice Lalere; Vincent Delatour; Joëlle Vinh
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Glycoprotein Enrichment Analytical Techniques: Advantages and Disadvantages.

Authors:  R Zhu; L Zacharias; K M Wooding; W Peng; Y Mechref
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Strategies of Drug Transporter Quantitation by LC-MS: Importance of Peptide Selection and Digestion Efficiency.

Authors:  Buyun Chen; Liling Liu; Hoangdung Ho; Yuan Chen; Ze Yang; Xiaorong Liang; Jian Payandeh; Brian Dean; Cornelis E C A Hop; Yuzhong Deng
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Prediction of missed proteolytic cleavages for the selection of surrogate peptides for quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Craig Lawless; Simon J Hubbard
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2012-07-17

Review 8.  Protein analysis by shotgun/bottom-up proteomics.

Authors:  Yaoyang Zhang; Bryan R Fonslow; Bing Shan; Moon-Chang Baek; John R Yates
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Quantitation of the dynamic profiles of the innate immune response using multiplex selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yingxin Zhao; Bing Tian; Chukwudi B Edeh; Allan R Brasier
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Systematic characterization of high mass accuracy influence on false discovery and probability scoring in peptide mass fingerprinting.

Authors:  Eric D Dodds; Brian H Clowers; Paul J Hagerman; Carlito B Lebrilla
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.