Literature DB >> 1180967

Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme.

B W Matthews.   

Abstract

Predictions of the secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme, made by a number of investigators on the basis of the amino acid sequence, are compared with the structure of the protein determined experimentally by X-ray crystallography. Within the amino terminal half of the molecule the locations of helices predicted by a number of methods agree moderately well with the observed structure, however within the carboxyl half of the molecule the overall agreement is poor. For eleven different helix predictions, the coefficients giving the correlation between prediction and observation range from 0.14 to 0.42. The accuracy of the predictions for both beta-sheet regions and for turns are generally lower than for the helices, and in a number of instances the agreement between prediction and observation is no better than would be expected for a random selection of residues. The structural predictions for T4 phage lysozyme are much less successful than was the case for adenylate kinase (Schulz et al. (1974) Nature 250, 140-142). No one method of prediction is clearly superior to all others, and although empirical predictions based on larger numbers of known protein structure tend to be more accurate than those based on a limited sample, the improvement in accuracy is not dramatic, suggesting that the accuracy of current empirical predictive methods will not be substantially increased simply by the inclusion of more data from additional protein structure determinations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1180967     DOI: 10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  875 in total

1.  Cascaded multiple classifiers for secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  M Ouali; R D King
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Improved detection of homologous membrane proteins by inclusion of information from topology predictions.

Authors:  Maria Hedman; Hans Deloof; Gunnar Von Heijne; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Prediction of protein functional domains from sequences using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  J Murvai; K Vlahovicek; C Szepesvári; S Pongor
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Discovering common stem-loop motifs in unaligned RNA sequences.

Authors:  J Gorodkin; S L Stricklin; G D Stormo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  ChloroP, a neural network-based method for predicting chloroplast transit peptides and their cleavage sites.

Authors:  O Emanuelsson; H Nielsen; G von Heijne
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Testing computational prediction of missense mutation phenotypes: functional characterization of 204 mutations of human cystathionine beta synthase.

Authors:  Qiong Wei; Liqun Wang; Qiang Wang; Warren D Kruger; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-07

7.  A branch point consensus from Arabidopsis found by non-circular analysis allows for better prediction of acceptor sites.

Authors:  N Tolstrup; P Rouzé; S Brunak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Molecular and metabolic pattern classification for detection of brain glioma progression.

Authors:  Farzin Imani; Fernando E Boada; Frank S Lieberman; Denise K Davis; James M Mountz
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 9.  Machine learning-enabled discovery and design of membrane-active peptides.

Authors:  Ernest Y Lee; Gerard C L Wong; Andrew L Ferguson
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Identification of DNA-binding proteins using structural, electrostatic and evolutionary features.

Authors:  Guy Nimrod; András Szilágyi; Christina Leslie; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.