Literature DB >> 15034119

Trypsin cleaves exclusively C-terminal to arginine and lysine residues.

Jesper V Olsen1, Shao-En Ong, Matthias Mann.   

Abstract

Almost all large-scale projects in mass spectrometry-based proteomics use trypsin to convert protein mixtures into more readily analyzable peptide populations. When searching peptide fragmentation spectra against sequence databases, potentially matching peptide sequences can be required to conform to tryptic specificity, namely, cleavage exclusively C-terminal to arginine or lysine. In many published reports, however, significant numbers of proteins are identified by non-tryptic peptides. Here we use the sub-parts per million mass accuracy of a new ion trap Fourier transform mass spectrometer to achieve more than a 100-fold increased confidence in peptide identification compared with typical ion trap experiments and show that trypsin cleaves solely C-terminal to arginine and lysine. We find that non-tryptic peptides occur only as the C-terminal peptides of proteins and as breakup products of fully tryptic peptides N-terminal to an internal proline. Simulating lower mass accuracy led to a large number of proteins erroneously identified with non-tryptic peptide hits. Our results indicate that such peptide hits in previous studies should be re-examined and that peptide identification should be based on strict trypsin specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15034119     DOI: 10.1074/mcp.T400003-MCP200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  254 in total

1.  Improved peptide identification in proteomics by two consecutive stages of mass spectrometric fragmentation.

Authors:  Jesper V Olsen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Occurrence of C-terminal residue exclusion in peptide fragmentation by ESI and MALDI tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mathieu Dupré; Sonia Cantel; Jean Martinez; Christine Enjalbal
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Analysis of protein mixtures from whole-cell extracts by single-run nanoLC-MS/MS using ultralong gradients.

Authors:  Thomas Köcher; Peter Pichler; Remco Swart; Karl Mechtler
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Identifying proteomic LC-MS/MS data sets with Bumbershoot and IDPicker.

Authors:  Jerry D Holman; Ze-Qiang Ma; David L Tabb
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-03

5.  Detecting low level sequence variants in recombinant monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Alex Strahan; Charlene Li; Amy Shen; Hongbin Liu; Jun Ouyang; Viswanatham Katta; Kathleen Francissen; Boyan Zhang
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 6.  Modern approaches for investigating epigenetic signaling pathways.

Authors:  Adam G Evertts; Barry M Zee; Benjamin A Garcia
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-01-28

7.  Capillary isoelectric focusing of individual mitochondria.

Authors:  Gregory G Wolken; Vratislav Kostal; Edgar A Arriaga
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Data analysis strategy for maximizing high-confidence protein identifications in complex proteomes such as human tumor secretomes and human serum.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Hsin-Yao Tang; Glenn C Tan; David W Speicher
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 9.  A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics.

Authors:  Nishant Pappireddi; Lance Martin; Martin Wühr
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.164

10.  Predicting Proteolysis in Complex Proteomes Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Matiss Ozols; Alexander Eckersley; Christopher I Platt; Callum Stewart-McGuinness; Sarah A Hibbert; Jerico Revote; Fuyi Li; Christopher E M Griffiths; Rachel E B Watson; Jiangning Song; Mike Bell; Michael J Sherratt
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.