Literature DB >> 17203911

Hearing ranges of laboratory animals.

Henry E Heffner1, Rickye S Heffner.   

Abstract

Any attempt to assess the effects of sounds on animals must consider species differences in hearing abilities. Although the hearing ranges of most species overlap to a large degree, considerable variation occurs in high- and low-frequency hearing as well as in absolute sensitivity. As a result, a sound that is easily audible to one species may be less audible, or even inaudible, to another. The purpose of this review is to describe the variation in the hearing ranges of common laboratory animals.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17203911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  75 in total

1.  Experiments in macaque monkeys provide critical insights into age-associated changes in cognitive and sensory function.

Authors:  Daniel T Gray; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  An effective, economical method of reducing environmental noise in the vivarium.

Authors:  Maggie T Young; Alan L French; Jeffrey W Clymer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 3.  Form and function of the mammalian inner ear.

Authors:  Eric G Ekdale
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Gestational Stress Augments Postpartum β-Amyloid Pathology and Cognitive Decline in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Zahra Jafari; Jogender Mehla; Bryan E Kolb; Majid H Mohajerani
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Patterns across multiple memories are identified over time.

Authors:  Blake A Richards; Frances Xia; Adam Santoro; Jana Husse; Melanie A Woodin; Sheena A Josselyn; Paul W Frankland
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Rodent auditory perception: Critical band limitations and plasticity.

Authors:  J King; M Insanally; M Jin; A R O Martins; J A D'amour; R C Froemke
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Complexity of frequency receptive fields predicts tonotopic variability across species.

Authors:  Quentin Gaucher; Mariangela Panniello; Aleksandar Z Ivanov; Johannes C Dahmen; Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Audiogram of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) from 2 Hz to 9 kHz.

Authors:  Evan M Hill; Gimseong Koay; Rickye S Heffner; Henry E Heffner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Electrophysiological properties of octopus neurons of the cat cochlear nucleus: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ramazan Bal; Giyasettin Baydas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-11

10.  Analysis of environmental sound levels in modern rodent housing rooms.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Bradford J May; Ziwei Judy Hao; Julie Watson
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 12.625

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.