Literature DB >> 21838981

An effective, economical method of reducing environmental noise in the vivarium.

Maggie T Young1, Alan L French, Jeffrey W Clymer.   

Abstract

High levels of ambient noise can have detrimental effects on laboratory animal wellbeing and may affect experimental results. In addition, excessive noise can reduce technician comfort and performance. This study was performed to determine whether inexpensive, passive acoustic noise abatement measures could meaningfully reduce noise levels. Sound level measurements for various activities were obtained in the incoming processing room for pigs before and after installing gypsum acoustic paneling, covering metal-to-metal contact points with strips of adhesive-backed rubber, and replacing hard plastic wheels on transport carts with neoprene wheels. The modifications reduced the overall average noise level by 8.1 dB. Average noise levels for each activity were all less than 85 dB after the modifications. Average noise levels can be reduced effectively and economically with passive abatement methods. Intermittent spikes in noise are more difficult to control and may require attention to the individual activity. Copyright 2011 by the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21838981      PMCID: PMC3148644     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  11 in total

1.  Affordable noise control in a laboratory animal facility.

Authors:  David L Carlton; William Richards
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 2.  The fundamentals of sound and its measurement.

Authors:  Larry F Hughes
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Are investigators aware of environmental noise in animal facilities and that this noise may affect experimental data?

Authors:  Ann L Baldwin; Gary E Schwartz; Douglas H Hopp
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 4.  Hearing ranges of laboratory animals.

Authors:  Henry E Heffner; Rickye S Heffner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  The impact of chronic environmental stressors on growing pigs, Sus scrofa (Part 1): stress physiology, production and play behaviour.

Authors:  E A O'Connor; M O Parker; M A McLeman; T G Demmers; J C Lowe; L Cui; E L Davey; R C Owen; C M Wathes; S M Abeyesinghe
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of unloading, lairage, pig handling, stunning and season on pH of pork.

Authors:  V Van de Perre; L Permentier; S De Bie; G Verbeke; R Geers
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Hearing in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) and goats (Capra hircus).

Authors:  R S Heffner; H E Heffner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  [The course of plasma concentrations of cathecholamines and corticosteroids and of plasma--bound iodine (PBJ) in swine under the effect of noise and of various methods of raising].

Authors:  A Kemper; V Wildenhahn; L Lyhs
Journal:  Arch Exp Veterinarmed       Date:  1976

9.  [Effect of long-lasting noise on the plasma concentration of catecholamines, glucocorticosteroids and PBI in pigs].

Authors:  A Kemper; V Wildenhahn; L Lyhs
Journal:  Arch Exp Veterinarmed       Date:  1976

10.  The impact of chronic environmental stressors on growing pigs, Sus scrofa (Part 2): social behaviour.

Authors:  M O Parker; E A O'Connor; M A McLeman; T G M Demmers; J C Lowe; R C Owen; E L Davey; C M Wathes; S M Abeyesinghe
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.