Literature DB >> 32420865

Complexity of frequency receptive fields predicts tonotopic variability across species.

Quentin Gaucher1, Mariangela Panniello1, Aleksandar Z Ivanov1, Johannes C Dahmen1, Andrew J King1, Kerry Mm Walker1.   

Abstract

Primary cortical areas contain maps of sensory features, including sound frequency in primary auditory cortex (A1). Two-photon calcium imaging in mice has confirmed the presence of these global tonotopic maps, while uncovering an unexpected local variability in the stimulus preferences of individual neurons in A1 and other primary regions. Here we show that local heterogeneity of frequency preferences is not unique to rodents. Using two-photon calcium imaging in layers 2/3, we found that local variance in frequency preferences is equivalent in ferrets and mice. Neurons with multipeaked frequency tuning are less spatially organized than those tuned to a single frequency in both species. Furthermore, we show that microelectrode recordings may describe a smoother tonotopic arrangement due to a sampling bias towards neurons with simple frequency tuning. These results help explain previous inconsistencies in cortical topography across species and recording techniques.
© 2020, Gaucher et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory cortex; ferret; frequency; maps; mouse; neuroscience; tonotopy; two-photon calcium imaging

Year:  2020        PMID: 32420865      PMCID: PMC7269667          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.53462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  63 in total

1.  Modular functional organization of cat anterior auditory field.

Authors:  Kazuo Imaizumi; Nicholas J Priebe; Poppy A C Crum; Purvis H Bedenbaugh; Steven W Cheung; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  How silent is the brain: is there a "dark matter" problem in neuroscience?

Authors:  Shy Shoham; Daniel H O'Connor; Ronen Segev
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Nonlinearities and contextual influences in auditory cortical responses modeled with multilinear spectrotemporal methods.

Authors:  Misha B Ahrens; Jennifer F Linden; Maneesh Sahani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Current source density profiles of stimulus-specific adaptation in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Francois D Szymanski; Jose A Garcia-Lazaro; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Representation of the cochlear partition of the superior temporal plane of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  M M Merzenich; J F Brugge
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-02-28       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Linking topography to tonotopy in the mouse auditory thalamocortical circuit.

Authors:  Troy A Hackett; Tania Rinaldi Barkat; Barbara M J O'Brien; Takao K Hensch; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The laminar and temporal structure of stimulus information in the phase of field potentials of auditory cortex.

Authors:  Francois D Szymanski; Neil C Rabinowitz; Cesare Magri; Stefano Panzeri; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Stimulus-timing-dependent plasticity of cortical frequency representation.

Authors:  Johannes C Dahmen; Douglas E H Hartley; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Representation of the cochlea in primary auditory cortex of the ferret (Mustela putorius).

Authors:  J B Kelly; P W Judge; D P Phillips
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The functional microarchitecture of the mouse barrel cortex.

Authors:  Takashi R Sato; Noah W Gray; Zachary F Mainen; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  Complexity of frequency receptive fields predicts tonotopic variability across species.

Authors:  Quentin Gaucher; Mariangela Panniello; Aleksandar Z Ivanov; Johannes C Dahmen; Andrew J King; Kerry Mm Walker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Enhanced representation of natural sound sequences in the ventral auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Eugenia González-Palomares; Luciana López-Jury; Francisco García-Rosales; Julio C Hechavarria
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  A silent two-photon imaging system for studying in vivo auditory neuronal functions.

Authors:  Xindong Song; Yueqi Guo; Chenggang Chen; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 20.257

Review 4.  Auditory thalamus dysfunction and pathophysiology in tinnitus: a predictive network hypothesis.

Authors:  Pia Brinkmann; Sonja A Kotz; Jasper V Smit; Marcus L F Janssen; Michael Schwartze
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 3.270

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.