Literature DB >> 17201357

Two noncontiguous locations can be attended concurrently: evidence from the attentional blink.

Jun-Ichiro Kawahara1, Yuki Yamada.   

Abstract

When two targets (T1 and T2) are inserted in a rapid stream of visual distractors (RSVP), detection/ identification accuracy of T2 is impaired at intertarget lags shorter than about 500 msec. This phenomenon, the attentional blink (AB), has been regarded as a hallmark of the inability of the visual system to process multiple items. Yet, paradoxically, the AB is much reduced when T2 is presented directly after T1 (known as lag-1 sparing). Because lag-1 sparing is said to depend on observers' spatial attention being set to process the first target, we predicted that if observers are set to monitor two RSVP streams, they could process more than two items; that is, two instances of lag-1 sparing would be obtained concurrently. The results of three experiments indicated that this was the case. When observers searched for two targets in each of two synchronized RSVP streams, lag-1 sparing occurred concurrently in both streams. These results suggest that the visual system can handle up to four items at one moment under RSVP circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17201357     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Evidence for split attentional foci.

Authors:  E Awh; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship.

Authors:  S I Shih
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-10

3.  The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations.

Authors:  T A Visser; S M Zuvic; W F Bischof; V Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

4.  Facilitation of local information processing in the attentional blink as indexed by the shooting line illusion.

Authors:  Jun-ichiro Kawahara
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2002-05

5.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight.

Authors:  M M Müller; P Malinowski; T Gruber; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics.

Authors:  T A RYAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Speed of processing in the human visual system.

Authors:  S Thorpe; D Fize; C Marlot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture.

Authors:  C L Folk; R Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The attentional blink.

Authors:  K L Shapiro; J E Raymond; K M Arnell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Alexa B Roggeveen; James T Enns; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-15

2.  Erroneous selection of a non-target item improves subsequent target identification in rapid serial visual presentations.

Authors:  Yuki Yamada; Atsunori Ariga; Kayo Miura; Takahiro Kawabe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02-28

3.  On spatial attention and its field size on the repulsion effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Cutrone; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Pupillary dilation elicited by attending to two disks with different luminance.

Authors:  Xiaofei Hu; Rumi Hisakata; Hirohiko Kaneko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Dynamically partitionable autoassociative networks as a solution to the neural binding problem.

Authors:  Kenneth J Hayworth
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.