Literature DB >> 23700069

Screening participation for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer due to family history: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Driss Ait Ouakrim1, Trevor Lockett, Alex Boussioutas, John L Hopper, Mark A Jenkins.   

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of observational studies to identify and summarise the level of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation for people at increased risk due to family history of the disease. Medline, Cinhal, Embase and PsychInfo databases were comprehensively searched between January 1995 and May 2012 to identify relevant articles. To be included, studies had to report on screening for people who had at least one first-degree relative with CRC and no previous personal diagnosis of the disease. Pooled screening participation levels were calculated for each screening modality. Seventeen studies, accounting for a total of 13,269 subjects with a family history of CRC met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies, including a total of 6,901 subjects had a pooled faecal occult blood testing screening participation (at least once) of 25 % (95 % CI 12-38). Five studies including a total of 5,091 subjects had a pooled sigmoidoscopy-based screening participation (at least once) of 16 % (95 % CI 7-27). Seven studies including a total of 9,965 subjects had pooled participation colonoscopy-based screening (at least once) of 40 % (95 % CI 26-54). There was a significant level of screening heterogeneity between studies. This review identified a substantial underuse of CRC screening for people at increased risk of developing the disease. It highlights the potential opportunity that exists for increasing screening participation among this segment of the population and the need to adjust the current CRC screening policies towards that objective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23700069     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9658-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  56 in total

1.  The colon cancer burden of genetically defined hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.

Authors:  W S Samowitz; K Curtin; H H Lin; M A Robertson; D Schaffer; M Nichols; K Gruenthal; M F Leppert; M L Slattery
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Aung Ko Win; Robert J Macinnis; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Measures of familial aggregation depend on definition of family history: meta-analysis for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Laura Baglietto; Mark A Jenkins; Gianluca Severi; Graham G Giles; D Timothy Bishop; Peter Boyle; John L Hopper
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Toward risk stratification for screening and surveillance of colorectal neoplasia: one small step for the colonoscopist.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Alex Boussioutas; Trevor Lockett; Ingrid Winship; Graham G Giles; Louisa B Flander; Louise Keogh; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-10-26

7.  Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Alex J Sutton; John P A Ioannidis; Norma Terrin; David R Jones; Joseph Lau; James Carpenter; Gerta Rücker; Roger M Harbord; Christopher H Schmid; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Jonathan J Deeks; Jaime Peters; Petra Macaskill; Guido Schwarzer; Sue Duval; Douglas G Altman; David Moher; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-22

8.  Adherence to screening examinations for colorectal cancer after diagnosis in a first-degree relative.

Authors:  J L Richardson; K Danley; G T Mondrus; D Deapen; T Mack
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Fecal occult blood testing: people in Ontario are unaware of it and not ready for it.

Authors:  Paul Ritvo; Ronald Myers; M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Lawrence Pazsat; Michelle Cotterchio; Roberta Howlett; Verna Mai; Patrick Brown; Terrence Sullivan; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Lloyd A Mack; Linda S Cook; Walley J Temple; Linda E Carlson; Robert J Hilsden; Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  20 in total

1.  Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Bauer; Jürgen F Riemann; Thomas Seufferlein; Max Reinshagen; Stephan Hollerbach; Ulrike Haug; Susanne Unverzagt; Stephanie Boese; Madeleine Ritter-Herschbach; Patrick Jahn; Thomas Frese; Michael Harris; Margarete Landenberger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Familial colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Franco Armelao; Giovanni de Pretis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Patient Electronic Health Records as a Means to Approach Genetic Research in Gastroenterology.

Authors:  Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; David Lieberman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Efficacy of an educational intervention on family physicians' risk assessment and management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J C Carroll; S Blaine; J Permaul; E Dicks; E Warner; M J Esplen; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; G Worrall; J McLaughlin
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-04-09

Review 5.  Practical opportunities to improve early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) in members of high-risk families.

Authors:  S G Patel; J T Lowery; D Gatof; D J Ahnen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Interest and informational preferences regarding genomic testing for modest increases in colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  A E Anderson; K G Flores; W Boonyasiriwat; A Gammon; W Kohlmann; W C Birmingham; M D Schwartz; J Samadder; K Boucher; A Y Kinney
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 7.  Use of blood-based biomarkers for early diagnosis and surveillance of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ganepola Ap Ganepola; Joel Nizin; John R Rutledge; David H Chang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-04-15

Review 8.  Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Dennis J Ahnen; Paul C Schroy; Heather Hampel; Nancy Baxter; C Richard Boland; Randall W Burt; Lynn Butterly; Megan Doerr; Mary Doroshenk; W Gregory Feero; Nora Henrikson; Uri Ladabaum; David Lieberman; Elizabeth G McFarland; Susan K Peterson; Martha Raymond; N Jewel Samadder; Sapna Syngal; Thomas K Weber; Ann G Zauber; Robert Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Applying the Health Belief Model to Quantify and Investigate Expectations for Computerized Cognitive Training.

Authors:  Jerri D Edwards; Christine B Philllips; Melissa L O'Connor; Jennifer L O'Brien; Elizabeth M Hudak; Jody S Nicholson
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2020-08-01

10.  Colonoscopy screening among US adults aged 40 or older with a family history of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Meng-Han Tsai; Sudha Xirasagar; Yi-Jhen Li; Piet C de Groen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.