Literature DB >> 17196312

Deciding to resuscitate extremely premature babies: how do parents and neonatologists engage in the decision?

Antoine Payot1, Sylvie Gendron, Francine Lefebvre, Hubert Doucet.   

Abstract

Parents at risk of delivering a baby at the threshold of viability are faced with a critical decision. When a child is born between 23 and 25 weeks of gestation, parents are asked to decide whether or not to resuscitate their child. In essence, they are faced with a choice between life and death. We conducted a qualitative study to explore how parents and neonatologists engage in decision-making in a context of imminent and unplanned delivery at the threshold of viability. Twelve parents and attending neonatologists in a specialized tertiary care centre in Montreal, Canada were separately interviewed immediately following neonatal consultation. Results highlight how neonatologists and parents engage in decision making from different standpoints: while neonatologists focus on the management of the unborn baby, parents have yet to fully conceptualize their infant as a distinct entity since they are in a process of grieving their pregnancy and their parenthood project. Moreover, in their attempt to ensure an informed decision, neonatologists adopt either of two models through provision of the most up-to-date and objective information available: "remaining as neutral as possible to allow parents to make their own decision", or, "formulating a proposal to which parents can choose or not to assent". Overall, if the provided information fits parents' expectations, they tend to feel confident with their decision. However, if it does not take their experience into account, their decision is experienced as a solitary process. Parents express the need to receive more than just factual information from neonatologists. They also require support and engagement from caregivers to manage the uncertainty. This brings into question the traditional concept of neutral informed consent and suggests the necessity of a shared decision-making model to ensure that the decision to resuscitate extremely premature babies, at the limits of viability, becomes a truly ethical task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17196312     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  36 in total

1.  Chest compressions and epinephrine during resuscitation of infants born at the border of viability: Yes, no or maybe?

Authors:  Gregory P Moore; Thierry Daboval; Kevin W Coughlin
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  A qualitative study of predelivery counselling for extreme prematurity.

Authors:  Elizabeth Young; Ellen Tsai; Anne O'Riordan
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Diversity, Conflict, and Recognition in Hospital Medical Practice.

Authors:  Sylvie Fortin; Serge Maynard
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03

4.  Parental Moral Distress and Moral Schism in the Neonatal ICU.

Authors:  Gabriella Foe; Jonathan Hellmann; Rebecca A Greenberg
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 5.  Parental decision-making for medically complex infants and children: an integrated literature review.

Authors:  Kimberly A Allen
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  CPS position statement for prenatal counselling before a premature birth: Simple rules for complicated decisions.

Authors:  Annie Janvier; Keith J Barrington; Khalid Aziz; Eduardo Bancalari; Daniel Batton; Carlo Bellieni; Brahim Bensouda; Carlos Blanco; Po-Yin Cheung; Felicia Cohn; Thierry Daboval; Peter Davis; Eugene Dempsey; Amélie Dupont-Thibodeau; Emanuela Ferretti; Barbara Farlow; Matteo Fontana; Etienne Fortin-Pellerin; Aviva Goldberg; Thor Willy Ruud Hansen; Marlyse Haward; Lajos Kovacs; Anie Lapointe; John Lantos; Colin Morley; Ahmed Moussa; Gabriel Musante; Sophie Nadeau; Colm Pf O'Donnell; Kristina Orfali; Antoine Payot; C Anthony Ryan; Guilherme Sant'anna; Ola D Saugstad; Sadath Sayeed; Theophil A Stokes; Eduard Verhagen
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  Can the Ethical Best Practice of Shared Decision-Making lead to Moral Distress?

Authors:  Trisha M Prentice; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  Prospective parents' perspectives on antenatal decision making for the anticipated birth of a periviable infant.

Authors:  Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Teresa A Savage; Robert E Kimura; Sarah J Kilpatrick; Miriam Kuppermann; William Grobman; Karen Kavanaugh
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-05

9.  Counselling and management for anticipated extremely preterm birth.

Authors:  Brigitte Lemyre; Gregory Moore
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  From powerlessness to empowerment: Mothers expect more than information from the prenatal consultation for preterm labour.

Authors:  Nathalie Gaucher; Antoine Payot
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.