| Literature DB >> 29802588 |
Gabriella Foe1, Jonathan Hellmann1,2, Rebecca A Greenberg3,4.
Abstract
Ethical dilemmas in critical care may cause healthcare practitioners to experience moral distress: incoherence between what one believes to be best and what occurs. Given that paediatric decision-making typically involves parents, we propose that parents can also experience moral distress when faced with making value-laden decisions in the neonatal intensive care unit. We propose a new concept-that parents may experience "moral schism"-a genuine uncertainty regarding a value-based decision that is accompanied by emotional distress. Schism, unlike moral distress, is not caused by barriers to making and executing a decision that is deemed to be best by the decision-makers but rather an encounter of significant internal struggle. We explore factors that appear to contribute to both moral distress and "moral schism" for parents: the degree of available support, a sense of coherence of the situation, and a sense of responsibility. We propose that moral schism is an underappreciated concept that needs to be explicated and may be more prevalent than moral distress when exploring decision-making experiences for parents. We also suggest actions of healthcare providers that may help minimize parental "moral schism" and moral distress.Entities:
Keywords: Bioethics; Decision-making; Moral distress; Neonatal intensive care; Parents
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29802588 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-018-9858-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bioeth Inq ISSN: 1176-7529 Impact factor: 1.352