Literature DB >> 17189143

Random Dot E stereotest: testability and reliability in 3- to 5-year-old children.

Paulette Schmidt, Maureen Maguire, Marjean Taylor Kulp, Velma Dobson, Graham Quinn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the proportion of preschoolers testable with the Random Dot E (RDE) stereotest and the between-tester reliability.
METHODS: Subjects were 1257 3- to 5-year-olds who were participants in Head Start programs in five communities. The sample was over-weighted with children who failed the routine Head Start vision screening (58% failures; 42% nonfailures). Each child had stereotesting attempted by two licensed eye care professionals using the RDE test, first in a screening setting and later in a comprehensive eye examination. Pretesting was performed at 50 cm. Children who discriminated between the nonstereo E and blank cards on 4 of 4 or 4 of 5 presentations were considered testable. Stereotesting was conducted at 50, 100, and 150 cm corresponding to 504, 252, and 168 arcsec disparity). Extent of agreement beyond chance between the screening and examination test results was assessed using the kappa (kappa) and weighted kappa (kappa(w)) statistics.
RESULTS: Testability increased with age at both the first (86% of 3-, 89% of 4-, and 93% of 5-year-olds; p = 0.02) and the second (90% of 3-, 94% of 4-, and 98% of 5-year-olds; p = 0.0001) sessions. Overall, stereopsis was better at the second session. Agreement between sessions was moderate (kappa(w) = 0.43; 59% identical scores). While identical scores increased with age (53% of 3-, 59% of 4-, and 63% of 5-year-olds), kappa(w) statistics did not differ with age (p = 0.49).
CONCLUSIONS: Child testability on the RDE stereotest was significantly better for older than younger preschool-age children. Overall, test-retest agreement was moderate and did not differ according to age. Testability rates of 98% and higher have been achieved in the same population with other screening tests including another random dot stereotest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17189143      PMCID: PMC1884952          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  19 in total

Review 1.  Preschool vision screening: summary of a Task Force report. Behalf of the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and the National Eye Institute Task Force on Vision Screening in the Preschool Child.

Authors:  E E Hartmann; V Dobson; L Hainline; W Marsh-Tootle; G E Quinn; M S Ruttum; P P Schmidt; K Simons
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Eye examination in infants, children, and young adults by pediatricians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  A new stereoscopic test for amblyopia screening.

Authors:  R D Reinecke; K Simons
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Stereoscopic threshold in children and adults.

Authors:  G Heron; S Dholakia; D E Collins; H McLaughlan
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1985-08

5.  The effectiveness of the random dot E stereotest as a preschool vision screening instrument.

Authors:  J Rosner
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1978-10

6.  Stereoacuity norms in young children.

Authors:  K Simons
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-03

7.  Comparing stereoscopic performance of children using the Titmus, TNO, and Randot stereo tests.

Authors:  J Cooper; J Feldman; D Medlin
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1979-07

8.  Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Paulette Schmidt; Maureen Maguire; Velma Dobson; Graham Quinn; Elise Ciner; Lynn Cyert; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Bruce Moore; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Maryann Redford; Gui-shuang Ying
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  A comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot circles stereotests in screening and office use.

Authors:  K Simons
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-03

10.  Testability of preschoolers on stereotests used to screen vision disorders.

Authors:  Paulette P Schmidt; Maureen G Maguire; Bruce Moore; Lynn Cyert
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Characterizing the Randot Preschool stereotest: Testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Sheima Rafiq; Jess Hugill; Therese Casanova; Carla Black; Adam O'Neill; Vicente Puyat; Helen Haggerty; Kathryn Smart; Christine Powell; Kate Taylor; Michael P Clarke; Kathleen Vancleef
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The potential cost-effectiveness of amblyopia screening programs.

Authors:  David B Rein; John S Wittenborn; Xinzhi Zhang; Michael Song; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.402

4.  Stereoacuity of preschool children with and without vision disorders.

Authors:  Elise B Ciner; Gui-Shuang Ying; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen G Maguire; Graham E Quinn; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Lynn A Cyert; Bruce Moore; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity.

Authors:  Wendy E Adams; David A Leske; Sarah R Hatt; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Age is highly associated with stereo blindness among surgeons: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Charlotte Fergo; Jakob Burcharth; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Test Re-Test Reliability and Validity of Different Visual Acuity and Stereoacuity Charts Used in Preschool Children.

Authors:  Diana Moganeswari; Jyothi Thomas; Krithica Srinivasan; George P Jacob
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

Review 8.  Vision Screening, Vision Disorders, and Impacts of Hyperopia in Young Children: Outcomes of the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) and Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Studies.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Elise Ciner; Gui-Shuang Ying; T Rowan Candy; Bruce D Moore; Deborah Orel-Bixler
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2022-01-18

9.  Stereotest Comparison: Efficacy, Reliability, and Variability of a New Glasses-Free Stereotest.

Authors:  Alice Grasso McCaslin; Kathleen Vancleef; Luke Hubert; Jenny C A Read; Nicholas Port
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 10.  Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth?

Authors:  Anna R O'Connor; Laurence P Tidbury
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.