Literature DB >> 14627942

Testability of preschoolers on stereotests used to screen vision disorders.

Paulette P Schmidt1, Maureen G Maguire, Bruce Moore, Lynn Cyert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to determine whether preschool children aged 3 years 0 months through 3 years 6 months could be tested with the Random Dot E, Stereo Smile, and Randot Preschool stereoacuity tests, which are random dot stereotests marketed for use with preschoolers.
METHODS: A total of 118 children from five Vision In Preschoolers Study Clinical Centers participated. Strabismic children, as determined by the cover test at distance and near, were excluded from this study. Stereopsis was tested on each child using each of the three tests in a variable, balanced order. A child's testability for each test was determined by the ability to complete the nonstereo task (pretest) and the gross stereo task for each stereotest. Proportions of children able to perform each test were compared using statistical methods accommodating multiple measurements per child.
RESULTS: Testability of children on the pretest was greater for the Stereo Smile test (91%) than for the Random Dot E test (81%; p = 0.007) or the Randot Preschool test (71%; p < 0.0001) and greater for the Random Dot E test than for the Randot Preschool test (p = 0.02). For all children, testability on the gross stereo task was greater for the Stereo Smile (77%; p < 0.0001) and Random Dot E (74%; p = 0.005) tests than for the Randot Preschool test (56%) but did not differ significantly between the Stereo Smile and Random Dot E tests (p = 0.19). There were no significant differences among the proportion of children able to complete the gross stereo task among those who were testable on the pretest (p > 0.12, all comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: Among preschoolers aged 3 years 0 months through 3 years 6 months, testability differs significantly across the three commercially available random dot stereotests evaluated. The results suggest that two-choice procedures increase testability of young preschoolers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14627942     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200311000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  12 in total

Review 1.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Visual Function of Moderately Hyperopic 4- and 5-Year-Old Children in the Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Elise B Ciner; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen G Maguire; Maxwell Pistilli; T Rowan Candy; Bruce Moore; Gui-Shuang Ying; Graham Quinn; Gale Orlansky; Lynn Cyert
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Random Dot E stereotest: testability and reliability in 3- to 5-year-old children.

Authors:  Paulette Schmidt; Maureen Maguire; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Velma Dobson; Graham Quinn
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  The potential cost-effectiveness of amblyopia screening programs.

Authors:  David B Rein; John S Wittenborn; Xinzhi Zhang; Michael Song; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.402

5.  Stereoacuity of preschool children with and without vision disorders.

Authors:  Elise B Ciner; Gui-Shuang Ying; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen G Maguire; Graham E Quinn; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Lynn A Cyert; Bruce Moore; Jiayan Huang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 6.  Tests for detecting strabismus in children aged 1 to 6 years in the community.

Authors:  Sarah Hull; Vijay Tailor; Sara Balduzzi; Jugnoo Rahi; Christine Schmucker; Gianni Virgili; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-06

Review 7.  Vision Screening, Vision Disorders, and Impacts of Hyperopia in Young Children: Outcomes of the Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) and Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Studies.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Elise Ciner; Gui-Shuang Ying; T Rowan Candy; Bruce D Moore; Deborah Orel-Bixler
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2022-01-18

8.  Comparison on testability of visual acuity, stereo acuity and colour vision tests between children with learning disabilities and children without learning disabilities in government primary schools.

Authors:  Nurul Farhana Abu Bakar; Ai-Hong Chen
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Eye examination testability in children with autism and in typical peers.

Authors:  Rachel Anastasia Coulter; Annette Bade; Yin Tea; Gregory Fecho; Deborah Amster; Erin Jenewein; Jacqueline Rodena; Kara Kelley Lyons; G Lynn Mitchell; Nicole Quint; Sandra Dunbar; Michele Ricamato; Jennie Trocchio; Bonnie Kabat; Chantel Garcia; Irina Radik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Two choices good, four choices better: For measuring stereoacuity in children, a four-alternative forced-choice paradigm is more efficient than two.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read; William Herbert; Nicola Goodship; Maeve Woodhouse; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.