Literature DB >> 17186399

Exposure-measurement error is frequently ignored when interpreting epidemiologic study results.

Anne M Jurek1, George Maldonado, Sander Greenland, Timothy R Church.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: One important source of error in study results is error in measuring exposures. When interpreting study results, one should consider the impact that exposure-measurement error (EME) might have had on study results.
METHODS: To assess how often this consideration is made and the form it takes, journal articles were randomly sampled from original articles appearing in the American Journal of Epidemiology and Epidemiology in 2001, and the International Journal of Epidemiology between December 2000 and October 2001.
RESULTS: Twenty-two (39%) of the 57 articles surveyed mentioned nothing about EME. Of the 35 articles that mentioned something about EME, 16 articles described qualitatively the effect EME could have had on study results. Only one study quantified the impact of EME on study results; the investigators used a sensitivity analysis. Few authors discussed the measurement error in their study in any detail.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the potential impact of EME on error in epidemiologic study results appears to be ignored frequently in practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17186399     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-006-9083-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  71 in total

1.  Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational data.

Authors:  Timothy L Lash; Aliza K Fink
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value?

Authors:  M Dosemeci; S Wacholder; J H Lubin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Is the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease greater for women than for men?

Authors:  L E Hebert; P A Scherr; J J McCann; L A Beckett; D A Evans
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India.

Authors:  D N Mazumder; R Haque; N Ghosh; B K De; A Santra; D Chakraborti; A H Smith
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Alcohol consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: atherosclerosis risk in communities study.

Authors:  W H Kao; I B Puddey; L L Boland; R L Watson; F L Brancati
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Re: "When will nondifferential misclassification of an exposure preserve the direction of a trend?".

Authors:  D C Thomas
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Placental abruption among singleton and twin births in the United States: risk factor profiles.

Authors:  C V Ananth; J C Smulian; K Demissie; A M Vintzileos; R A Knuppel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Exposure to tobacco smoke in utero and the risk of stillbirth and death in the first year of life.

Authors:  K Wisborg; U Kesmodel; T B Henriksen; S F Olsen; N J Secher
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Risk factors for the development of low back pain in adolescence.

Authors:  D E Feldman; I Shrier; M Rossignol; L Abenhaim
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Seasonal variation in cause-specific mortality: are there high-risk groups? 25-year follow-up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study.

Authors:  C T van Rossum; M J Shipley; H Hemingway; D E Grobbee; J P Mackenbach; M G Marmot
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  38 in total

1.  Using bayesian models to assess the effects of under-reporting of cannabis use on the association with birth defects, national birth defects prevention study, 1997-2005.

Authors:  Marleen M H J van Gelder; A Rogier T Donders; Owen Devine; Nel Roeleveld; Jennita Reefhuis
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Timing of blood extraction in epidemiologic and proteomic studies: results and proposals from the PANKRAS II Study.

Authors:  Miquel Porta; José Pumarega; Olga Ferrer-Armengou; Tomàs López; Joan Alguacil; Núria Malats; Esteve Fernàndez
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Recent trends in publications in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

Authors:  Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Physical activity--the more we measure, the more we know how to measure.

Authors:  Ylva Trolle Lagerros
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 6.  Uncertainty analysis: an example of its application to estimating a survey proportion.

Authors:  Anne M Jurek; George Maldonado; Sander Greenland; Timothy R Church
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 7.  Self-Report Dietary Assessment Tools Used in Canadian Research: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Lana Vanderlee; Amanda Raffoul; Jackie Stapleton; Ilona Csizmadi; Beatrice A Boucher; Isabelle Massarelli; Isabelle Rondeau; Paula J Robson
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.701

8.  Quantitative bias analysis in an asthma study of rescue-recovery workers and volunteers from the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks.

Authors:  Anne M Jurek; George Maldonado
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  The two-dimensional Monte Carlo: a new methodologic paradigm for dose reconstruction for epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; F Owen Hoffman; Eduard Hofer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?: Comparing 2 approaches to implausible values of change in body size.

Authors:  Christine L Gray; Whitney R Robinson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.