Literature DB >> 17568060

Uncertainty analysis: an example of its application to estimating a survey proportion.

Anne M Jurek1, George Maldonado, Sander Greenland, Timothy R Church.   

Abstract

Uncertainty analysis is a method, established in engineering and policy analysis but relatively new to epidemiology, for the quantitative assessment of biases in the results of epidemiological studies. Each uncertainty analysis is situation specific, but usually involves four main steps: (1) specify the target parameter of interest and an equation for its estimator; (2) specify the equation for random and bias effects on the estimator; (3) specify prior probability distributions for the bias parameters; and (4) use Monte-Carlo or analytic techniques to propagate the uncertainty about the bias parameters through the equation, to obtain an approximate posterior probability distribution for the parameter of interest. A basic example is presented illustrating uncertainty analyses for four proportions estimated from a survey of the epidemiological literature.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17568060      PMCID: PMC2465740          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.053660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  9 in total

1.  Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational data.

Authors:  Timothy L Lash; Aliza K Fink
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Quantifying and reporting uncertainty from systematic errors.

Authors:  Carl V Phillips
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Interval estimation by simulation as an alternative to and extension of confidence intervals.

Authors:  Sander Greenland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 4.  Randomization, statistics, and causal inference.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Exposure-measurement error is frequently ignored when interpreting epidemiologic study results.

Authors:  Anne M Jurek; George Maldonado; Sander Greenland; Timothy R Church
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Bayesian perspectives for epidemiological research: I. Foundations and basic methods.

Authors:  Sander Greenland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Leukemia attributable to residential magnetic fields: results from analyses allowing for study biases.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Leeka Kheifets
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer.

Authors:  Kyle Steenland; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Occupational exposure to glycol ethers and human congenital malformations.

Authors:  George Maldonado; Elizabeth Delzell; Rochelle W Tyl; Lowell E Sever
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 3.015

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Uncertain outcomes: adjusting for misclassification in antimalarial efficacy studies.

Authors:  K A Porter; C L Burch; C Poole; J J Juliano; S R Cole; S R Meshnick
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Using lifetime risk estimates in personal genomic profiles: estimation of uncertainty.

Authors:  Quanhe Yang; W Dana Flanders; Ramal Moonesinghe; John P A Ioannidis; Idris Guessous; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Specifying exposure classification parameters for sensitivity analysis: family breast cancer history.

Authors:  Anne M Jurek; Timothy L Lash; George Maldonado
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 4.  Mapping Soil Transmitted Helminths and Schistosomiasis under Uncertainty: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Evidence.

Authors:  Andrea L Araujo Navas; Nicholas A S Hamm; Ricardo J Soares Magalhães; Alfred Stein
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-12-22

5.  Quantifying and Adjusting for Disease Misclassification Due to Loss to Follow-Up in Historical Cohort Mortality Studies.

Authors:  Laura L F Scott; George Maldonado
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Evaluating uncertainty to strengthen epidemiologic data for use in human health risk assessments.

Authors:  Carol J Burns; J Michael Wright; Jennifer B Pierson; Thomas F Bateson; Igor Burstyn; Daniel A Goldstein; James E Klaunig; Thomas J Luben; Gary Mihlan; Leonard Ritter; A Robert Schnatter; J Morel Symons; Kun Don Yi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.