Literature DB >> 17180555

Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis.

Yasuyuki Fukami1, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Eiji Sakamoto, Shunichiro Komatsu, Takashi Hiromatsu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with perforated appendicitis.
METHODS: This study involved a total of 73 consecutive patients who had undergone appendectomy for perforated appendicitis between January 1999 and December 2004. While 39 patients underwent open appendectomy (OA) during the first 3 years, the remaining 34 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) during the last 3 years.
RESULTS: There was no case of LA converted to OA. No significant difference was found in the operating time between the two groups. Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with less analgesic use, earlier oral intake restart (LA, 2.6 days; OA, 5.1 days), shorter median hospital stay (LA, 11.7 days; OA, 25.8 days), and lower rate of wound infections (LA, 8.8%; OA, 43.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that LA for perforated appendicitis is a safe procedure that may prove to have significant clinical advantages over conventional surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17180555     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-006-0065-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  23 in total

1.  Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy.

Authors:  T M Khalili; J R Hiatt; A Savar; C Lau; D R Margulies
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Jimmy B Y So; Ee-Cherk Chiong; Edmond Chiong; Wei-Keat Cheah; David Lomanto; Peter Goh; Cheng-Kiong Kum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  A B Johnson; M E Peetz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Primary versus delayed wound closure in complicated appendicitis: an international systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marion C W Henry; R Lawrence Moss
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  R C Frazee; W T Bohannon
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-05

6.  A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.

Authors:  L K Temple; D E Litwin; R S McLeod
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass.

Authors:  P S P Senapathi; D Bhattacharya; B J Ammori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy.

Authors:  F Bonanni; J Reed; G Hartzell; D Trostle; R Boorse; M Gittleman; A Cole
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Laparoscopic is not better than open appendectomy.

Authors:  K N Apelgren; R G Molnar; J M Kisala
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Markides; Daren Subar; Kallingal Riyad
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yoshiro Taguchi; Shunichiro Komatsu; Eiji Sakamoto; Shinji Norimizu; Yuji Shingu; Hiroshi Hasegawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: an Update of the Literature.

Authors:  Christos Athanasiou; Sonia Lockwood; Georgios A Markides
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Gaik S Quah; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Talha; Hany El-Haddad; Abd-Elhamid Ghazal; Gihan Shehata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic appendectomy as a teaching procedure: experiences with 1,197 patients in a community hospital.

Authors:  René Fahrner; Othmar Schöb
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Comparison of clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  P Horvath; J Lange; R Bachmann; F Struller; A Königsrainer; M Zdichavsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Preoperative C-reactive protein predicts the severity and likelihood of complications following appendicectomy.

Authors:  J A Shelton; J J S Brown; J A Young
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Laparoscopic approach in perforated appendicitis: increased incidence of surgical site infection?

Authors:  R Galli; V Banz; H Fenner; J Metzger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic appendectomy by residents: evaluating outcomes and learning curve.

Authors:  Yap Yan Lin; Asim Shabbir; Jimmy B Y So
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.